Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:53:47 -0600
David Thomson wrote:
As for the unification of the forces, the strong force has never been quantified in terms of dimensions before.
Sure it has. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is a gauge theory on an SU(3) fiber bundle over spacetime. That _IS_ geometry, and the Lagrangian density is just the curvature of the bundle (just as in GR it is the curvature of spacetime).
In case you don't know it, QCD is a component of the standard model of particle physics.
According to the SM, the strong force is mediated by pi mesons, or pions.
Not at all!!!! If you are going to attempt to make statements about modern theories of physics, you owe it to yourself and your readers to LEARN about those theories. This claim is so bad is isn't even wrong.
In the standard model, the gauge Boseons of the strong force are called gluons (presumably what you mean by "mediators"). Pions are combinations of a quark + anti-quark pair bound by gluons.
In days of yore, long before the standard model, it was initially thought that pions were the "Yukawa particle" that mediated the strong force. This has been known to be wrong for many decades.
My model shows the strong force is actually mediated by a
different type of charge from electrostatic charge.
That is _precisely_ what color is in the standard model (QCD).
> [... futher nonsense and ignorant claims omitted]
I have no idea what this has to do with Dayton Miller's data....
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- References:
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Prev by Date: Re: Lienard-Wiechert potential
- Next by Date: Re: Free fall and clocks ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Next by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|