Re: Ping jem
- From: "AllYou!" <Idaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:09:39 -0500
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:DAcqf.5520$xF6.4717@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Josef Matz:
"Josef Matz" <josefmatz@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:43a938ee$0$9647$9b4e6d93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSpecial relativity Lorentz transforms do not describe anything real.
Absolutely right. Science is about what you measure. "Reality" is unobtainable by measurement. The transforms describe what one inertial observer measures, in terms of what a different inertial observer measures.
David A. Smith
Theyare illusion. Its just r4 = r + v t ant t4 = t in moved systems local.
Make Newtonian mechanics with two additional assumptions:
1. Mass is velocity dependent 2. Put the velocity dependent masses into Newtons Law of Gravity because Actio = Reactio.
Then you get the right perihelion of mercury. Einsteins Law that the mass is velocity dependent garantees that there are no unallowed FTL movements of mass, because real frames ( also non inertial ones) are always bound to mass objects.
Assume further: Photons have a dynamic mass. They always run at c. While climbing down and up in an gravity potential their mass and frequency changes according to
E = hbar w = m c2 ; hbar w4 - G m4 m(mass) / r4 = hbar w ; hbar w4 = m4c2
then you see that the photons win energy while going into the gravity field and lose energy when they climb outside. They are attracted which leads to the light bend effect.
So what ?
When you did solve any problem ( the easiest a two body problem like a sun system consisting only of mercury and sun) Then you can also ask what you see. (Red and blueshifts of hypothetical lamps on merury for example, true rotation with respect to observed, actual observational position).
The universe is an unbound infinite universe. If you make travels near c you will never come to an end. The character of the expansion is ballistic ( v(radial)=const ). If you transform onto another mass, new transforms (not depending on velocity but on location) take place. The visible universe has other transforms but they are virtual transforms. The visible region is where these transforms stay real.
The universe must be infinite otherwise it would be unlogic.
Explain the accelerated aging of the universe due to the fact that the observed Hubble constant was smaller in former times.
So what ? Is this the Grand Unification where QM and Electrodynamics can live with ?
Were the biggest mistakes in SR the Lorentz transforms of room and time and the concept of eigentime and lenght contraction and time dilation ? Was the next big mistake that the velocity dependent masses have not been put into Newtons Law ? Did they forget this and therefore got the wrong sign in the mercury correction ? If so GR is wrong. And it is so.
This is not the end of Relativity but the beginning of a new one. And many things of the old relativity remain.
So i ask you: What experiments and observations can not be explained by this theory ?
Joe
josefmatz@xxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- They verified a wrong theory
- From: Josef Matz
- Re: They verified a wrong theory
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- They verified a wrong theory
- Prev by Date: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
- Next by Date: Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
- Previous by thread: Re: They verified a wrong theory
- Next by thread: Re: They verified a wrong theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|