Re: GPS corrections


"Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:b4rqf.9999$LB5.5377@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42qqf.35029$7h7.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Koobee Wublee wrote:
> >> "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote in message news:L8cqf.78001$lt2.5051463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>Look at
> >>> http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
> >>
> >> Taylor's derivation above violates the principle of special relativity.
> >
> > I have no idea why you think that is relevant. GR itself does not obey
> > that principle -- GR has a far more general principle: general covariance.
>
> Apparently, you have not read and understood Taylor's paper on GPS.
>
> > [The principle of special relativity says in effect that the
> > laws of physics do not depend upon one's choice of inertial
> > frame; GR has no such dependence on inertial frames, and
> > its principle is that the laws of physics do not depend
> > on _any_ choice of coordinates.]
>
> Well, you can do better than that. To disprove my statement above, you have
> to show me what I have not already known and understood. You have to show
> Neil Ashby's attempt to derive GPS time dilation is as nutty as I am.

You aren't merely nutty.
You are disgusting.

Original, but removed from archives:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&threadm=fytJa.78487%24%2542.6441%40fed1read06
But we still have the reply:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&threadm=XvKJa.100908$hd6.25327@fed1read05
| "Australopithecus Afarensis" <lucy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:fytJa.78487$%42.6441@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Thanks for posting all that and your own comments at the end. There are so
| > many lies after lies conjured up against the Nazis. I guess I'd better read
| > "Mein Kampf" to get it from the horse's mouth. It will be on my
| > things-to-do list for the near future.

There is more:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7dd80442f8d16bc0

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relativity Principle Revisited
    ... What about Doppler's "LAW OF PHYSICS"? ... Doppler shift) does NOT apply equally to all inertial frames of reference. ... And just as the utility of Euclidean geometry collapses in the analysis of extreme distances in curved spacetime, so too could the failure of the Relativity Principle yield in other ways. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Twin paradox negation lll
    ... between different inertial frames. ... relativity by asserting that all laws of physics take the ... that's not what the principle of relativity says at all. ... any introductory physics book. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
    ... Likely Vdm has never heard of the principle of relativity. ... laws of motion take the same form in all inertial frames. ... special theory of relativity by asserting that all laws of physics ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity of Simultaneity the sequel to the sequel...
    ... << Einstein's relativity principle states that: ... between different inertial frames. ... relativity by asserting that all laws of physics take the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Riedt vs Einstein
    ... The principle was introduced by Poincaré. ... > Einstein's second postulate of Special Relativity (Principle of the ... > the length of the other path (across the perpendicular arm and back) is ... This solution by Lorentz, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)