Re: 'gravitons'

Dear Joe Fischer:

"Joe Fischer" <efischer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pa3vq1l1a6f323og7idqj2m395lq4rs2bd@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>A solution based on a continuum is already known
>>NOT to be a solution. Your efforts are your own,
>>but your effort is in the wrong direction. Please
>>study some physics, it will be time well spent.
>
> If you are saying/thinking quantum theory
> rules out a spacetime mapping construct, it doesn't.

I am not saying that. I am saying that gravitons are endemic to
quantum theory, and quantum theory does not require a continuum
of spacetime.

> Why should any theory rule out any way
> to represent distance or time in any way math
> can describe it.

Any tool can and should be used within its domain of
applicability. Quantum theory should not be "dissed" simply
because it is not a continuum theory.

> Has the flow of time been quantized?

Not likely to be.

David A. Smith


.

Relevant Pages
Loading