Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Dec 2005 03:22:28 -0800
<< There is no reason an object has to be
lifted 4000 miles above the Earth's surface to be
located 4000 miles above the Earth's surface. >>
There certaintly is a reason.
You don't get a charge pair separated by some
distance without burning some fuel.
http://laser.phys.ualberta.ca/~egerton/pair-p&a.htm
<< The bigger the mass of the particle, the bigger
the energy needed to produce a particle-antiparticle
pair. Electrons are the easiest particles to generate,
and the energies go up from there. Quarks require
more energy to create than electrons do, and different
types of quarks require different amounts of energy,
as they have different masses. >>
http://www.steelypips.org/principles/2003_07_06_principlearchive.php
http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~rod/tvuniv.htm
The forces acting between massive bodies don't begin
and end when your experiment begins and ends.
Sue...
.
- References:
- Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- From: Joe Fischer
- Falling Objects, How They Fall
- Prev by Date: Re: Hobba's misconceptions
- Next by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Previous by thread: Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- Next by thread: Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|