Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:59:02 -0600
David Thomson wrote:
Charge is a measurable dimension. There are only two types of charge, electrostatic and electromagnetic. Period. No other form of charge has ever been measured.
You _REALLY_ need to learn about modern physics. Not a single thing you said here is true.
Charge is a _scalar_, not a "dimension". There are several types of charge in modern physics: electric, weak, strong. There is no "electromagnetic charge" distinct from electric charge.
The so-called "weak interaction," which you incorrectly labeled "weak
charge" is merely a proportion of the electrostatic and electromagnetic
charges.
This is simply not true.
You need to LEARN about modern physics before attempting to discuss it. <shrug>
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- References:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Prev by Date: Re: 'gravitons'
- Next by Date: Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
- Previous by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|