Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy




"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135868770.688889.225990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dastardly Fiend wrote:
>> "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1135826109.189041.17310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > LameDuck wrote:
>> >> Can you give me an outline of how I should order it my essay. Like
>> >> what
>> >> I should talk about first and what I should talk about last
>> >>
>> >> Also can you give me something easier that a high school sophmore
>> >> might
>> >> understand.
>> >>
>> >> But thanx for your reply.
>> >
>> > The maths might be simpler here:
>> > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/releng.html#c4
>>
>> He asked for help in chemistry class, sophomore level, not math
>> or particle physics.
>> I know you mean well, but shut up, you silly goose.
> A. psychology is really biology,
> B biology is really chemistry,
> C chemistry is really physics,
> D physics is really mathematics,
> E mathematics is really hard,
>
> So if A implies E...
> then you are a hard-head.
> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
> :o)

Yep.

"chi(x, t) whose spatial and temporal derivatives transform
one set of electromagnetic potentials into another equivalent set"
Explain the babble you tote around like a badge of office,
casting curses where'er you go, little apprentice witch Minnie
Mouse.
Der alte Hexenmeister.

http://www.fln.vcu.edu/goethe/zauber_dual.html
"dududu DUH" - Paul Dukas.

> Sue...
>
>
>
>> Dastardly Fiend.
>>
>> > Try to focus on pair production and annihilation for mass/energy
>> > equivalence because it is complete conversion so the math is
>> > simple
>> > 0.511MeV + 0.511MeV = 1.022 MeV
>> > (Mega electron volts are convertable to grams)
>> >
>> > Maybe you could contrast the relativistic point of view
>> > with the chemical (thermodynamic) point of view.
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass
>> >
>> > Here is your first sentence:
>> > <<
>> > The conservation of energy principle is one of the foundation
>> > principles of all science disciplines. In varied areas of science
>> > there will be primary equations which can be seen to be just
>> > an appropriate reformulation of the principle of conservation
>> > of energy. >>
>> > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/conser.html#coneng
>> >
>> > Put it in italics and credit the source.
>> >
>> > Why not post your outline and get some suggestions?
>> > << What should an outline look like?
>> >
>> > It doesn't really matter. Unless you have to hand it in for marks or
>> > you really do like the process, don't feel you have to get bogged down
>> > in the formal, "roman-numeral" structure. If webbing or point form does
>> > it for you, then that's what you should use.
>> >
>> > Check out this possible template for an argumentative paper and this
>> > one for an analytical paper. Remember that they are just possible
>> > structural ideas. Now that you're an expert critical problem-solver,
>> > we're sure you can modify them to suit the needs of your particular
>> > paper. >>
>> > http://owl.english.purdue.edu/workshops/hypertext/ResearchW/outline.html
>> >
>> > Sue...
>> >
>


.



Relevant Pages