Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists

David Thomson wrote:
[...]

The distinction is of usage: one says mass _HAS_ the dimensions of mass, not that "mass is a dimension". Your unfamiliarity with the common usage cause me to see the other definition of "dimension" than the one you meant.


Tom Roberts	tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: space-time + matter/energy OR space-time-matter
    ... Mass is not a dimension. ... wikipeida quote to support "common usage" of the term. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
    ... dimensional entity of Force for the dimensional entity of Mass as ... The objective universe consists of matter, ... Matter resists motion or alteration of motion. ... So we see that dimension, space, time, mass, inertia, momentum, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... > Mass is not, length and time are. ... This is another problem with modern physics, ... reviewed literature that mass *is* a dimension in physics. ... The same goes for charge as dimension and charge as measurement. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: From relativity to distributed, 5th dimension added easily
    ... mass arises in the fifth dimension. ... forming 3 dimensional volume to Energy. ... I refered to velocity of mass being a factor to Power, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Is mass a 3D phenomenon?
    ... "Mass as a Dimension ... should tell us something about potential tactile perception. ... coordinated with other potentials as second time dimension. ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast