Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO


Jerry wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> > Jerry wrote:
> > > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tucker think's
> > > > Very Long wave EM and GR-radiation are the same thing.
> > >
> > > Exactly what do you mean by that?
> > > Jerry
> >
> > There is evidence PSR1913 radiates energy,
> >

>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_1913_plus_16

> > Dr. Carlip has explained to me that it's unlikely the orbital
> > period variation is of Newtonian origin, (that may involve "n"
> > bodies), so the consensus is in good agreement the radiation
> > is a GR-effect and is gravitational and the LIGO's intend to
> > verify that. Certainly the whole scientific world is waiting
> > for some positive "thump" from the apparatus, and though
> > in infantcy, the baby is a little too quiet. I accept that, but
> > there are alternatives.
> >
> > I showed* GR is compatible with the Coulomb Force being
> > slightly stronger if attactive than repulsive and mimicks the
> > force of gravitation.
>
> Such a theory would predict quite severe violations of the
> equivalence principle that should have been detected long
> ago by Eotvos experiments comparing substances of
> differing ratio of atomic number to atomic mass.

That's an important objection, however in the article,

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/KST/GR_Charge_Couple3.pdf

you will find it produces Newton's gravity as a 1st approx.
and nullifies that objection.
You might object that the covariant derivative of the metric
tensor may violate EP if it does not vanish, but we find the
Quantum Theory is compatible with that condition, so the
EP looks safe and well.

> Your theory doesn't even count as DOA.

LOL, who says it's my theory, it's clearly a GR application,
solution, but it is unique enough to be termed "Unitivity",
since it departs substantially from classical GR, but
agreed it certainly is live and well.
Ken

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
    ... >> Ken S. Tucker wrote: ... >>> and nullifies that objection. ... > Hmmm, does Jerry underastand ... theory to satisfy the EP, and if not, why not? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Exhibitions, do you like them
    ... No - I don't like people taking all their clothes off in public....... ... On the contrary - no objection if they are of class 40-24-37. ... You've met Jerry then? ... Anon ...
    (uk.rec.models.rail)