Re: Latter Day MMX
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Dec 2005 13:04:01 -0800
In <dp5p68$muj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Martin Hogbin <goatREMOVETHIS...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> . . . .
O'Barr wrote: . . . .
>> Gravity is not like normal forms of radiation such
>> as light. It is more like heat being carried by
>> particle motions. But even this is not a good
>> enough description, since heat is itself an
>> addition of actual energy. Gravity does not
>> require any additional energy or any change in
>> energy for it to exist. . . .
Martin Hogbin wrote:
>Is that a: 'Yes gravity waves will be detected, more
>or less as predicted'; or 'No, nothing like the
>expected waves will be detected'?
O'Barr comments:
I told you exactly what gravity was, and that it
was a gradient in the ether that is reflecting a
slight increase in the standard deviation of the size
distribution of the ether particles. In deep space,
where there is sufficient distances where ether
particles can begin to interact with only themselves,
these deviations in sizes begin to return to normal.
But around matter, the results are always a slight
increase in their dispersions. And all objects that
causes dispersions of dispersions, which matter does,
will move in the direction of greatest dispersions.
Therefore, all matter seeks other matter, which are
the sources of dispersions, and all matter flee from
large empty space, where dispersions are the least!
(Since the effective mean free path between ether
particles are so great, then it really takes a lot of
free space before any significant effects of 'space
cleansings' can occur. These free space distances
must be many times the normal spacing between
galaxies for this effect to become in evidence.)
So you tell me, Martin Hogbin: Can you have a
wave when there is only a slight change in the
dispersions involved? If you had a gas composed of
one isotope, and at one fixed location in this gas
you released one isotope heavier and one lighter for
every two isotopes you were able to remove from the
gas at that point, what would you be able to have as
'a wave' of these released isotopes? Be sure you
understand the question: Could these few randomly
released isotopes be forming waves totally
independent of the gas into which they were being
released? And the velocities of each of these
released isotopes are different, etc.
Now since ether particles never bounce (they only
spall), then this is not really a fair question, but
with this understanding of the physical relationship
behind the cause of gravity, you should at least be
able to appreciate the difficulties in having wave
effects. If you have sensitive equipment, you will
always be able to see gravity changes. But for you,
or for anyone else, to be able to say that these
gravity changes are wave effects, it has to be
something more than just having changes.
To be as scientific as possible, a wave connotes a
very complicated physical system where there is an
exchange occurring between a kinetic energy state and
a potential energy state so that there is a
propagation (in time or in space or both), a
propagation that is repeatable, etc. Such a
condition does not exist with gravity. Changes can
occur, as was said, and these changes can be cyclic,
but the rate of amplitude fall-off will be higher
than that seen by a true wave, higher than the actual
average of the total force, etc.
Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
.
- References:
- Latter Day MMX
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Latter Day MMX
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Latter Day MMX
- Prev by Date: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Previous by thread: Re: Latter Day MMX
- Next by thread: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
