sci.physics.relativity
- Found the answer for my need of Brain Juice question!,
guskz
- "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics",
Skrow
- Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity,
Bill Hobba
- I need someone's brain juice here?,
guskz
- Gravitational Radiation from the source,
Joe Fischer
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY,
Bart Chappell
- "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Skrow
- The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!,
Y.Porat
- Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.,
Sue...
- Three Ring Circus,
skearney
- Eotvos units - pretty pictures,
Joe Fischer
- Understanding the Lorentz transformations,
xray4abc
- Re: Ken Tucker, meet Robert Brown ...,
Ken S. Tucker
- "The Einstein Hoax",
Skrow
- Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Drifta12
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
LameDuck
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Sue...
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Mike
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bilge
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Mike
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bilge
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Bilge
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy,
Jerry
- Re: The Postulates of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory),
Daniel Weston
- speed of light versus c, again,
argon
- "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Skrow
- Re: Time dilation etc.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- consider this,
artificial sweetner
- new theory,
artificial sweetner
- intelligent created gravitons,
artificial sweetner
- "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?",
Egap
- Latter Day MMX,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
kenseto
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Jerry
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Sue...
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Der alte Hexenmeister
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Latter Day MMX,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Both ways at once?,
Joe Fischer
- take a break!,
spike
- A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Daniel Weston
Message not available
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Bill Hobba
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
artificial sweetner
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Sue...
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Tom Roberts
Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Bilge
Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
PD
Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL,
Aetherist
O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets",
Skrow
يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر,
Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?,
Mark Martin
gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test,
Joe Fischer
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Elgnis
Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Sue...
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Sue...
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Sue...
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Randy Poe
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Sue...
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
snapdragon31
- Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space,
Bilge
Re: CHRIST: THE ARRIVAL,
George Hammond
mysterious motion, em or outgasing,
Joe Fischer
Interest in Physics,
Joe Fischer
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Exper...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Bilge
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Bilge
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
kenseto
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
kenseto
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts,
Eric Gisse
"The Nature of Mass",
Elgnis
'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: 'gravitons',
Tom Roberts
- Re: 'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
Tom Roberts
- Re: 'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
Tom Roberts
- Re: 'gravitons',
argon
- Re: 'gravitons',
Sue...
- Re: 'gravitons',
argon
- Re: 'gravitons',
Tom Roberts
- Re: 'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
Sue...
- Re: 'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
Sue...
- Re: 'gravitons',
Bilge
- Re: 'gravitons',
Tom Roberts
- Re: 'gravitons',
Thomas Heger
- Re: 'gravitons',
Aetherist
- Re: 'gravitons',
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: 'gravitons',
Bilge
- Re: 'gravitons',
PD
- Re: 'gravitons',
Koobee Wublee
Re: There Is a Horror in Einstein's Cult,
Joe Fischer
"Hollywood Physics",
tuvok
Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Aetherist
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Sepp
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Sue...
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
argon
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Sue...
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
stephen
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
PD
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
PD
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
PD
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Rudi Menter
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Rudi Menter
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Rudi Menter
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Rudi Menter
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Rudi Menter
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
PD
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
PD
- Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall,
Mike
cnn is asking "are we trusting the scientists too much?",
argon
Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
GSS
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Nick Summers
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
GSS
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Roe
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Androcles
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
GSS
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
GSS
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
GSS
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Mike
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Mike
- Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame,
Tom Roberts
FTL approach marker,
Sue...
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Elgnis
Merry Christmas,
The_Red_Telephone
Re: On the Theory and Physics of the Aether,
shuba
SR ether moving clocks,
beda pietanza
johnreed take 1C --- 2005,
randamajor
Re: Orbiting planet,
jaska
Greetings, NUTS,
Joe Fischer
Re: Einsteinians Test Einstein about E=mc2,
Joe Fischer
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Egap
Only a Fool,
Joe Fischer
holographic principle and relitivity,
penguinista
Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.,
Len Gaasenbeek
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
They verified a wrong theory,
Josef Matz
GPS corrections,
Hauke Reddmann
- Re: GPS corrections,
Androcles
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
mluttgens
- Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: GPS corrections,
Androcles
- Re: GPS corrections,
Hauke Reddmann
- Re: GPS corrections,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: GPS corrections,
Dirk Van de moortel
Why relativists are trolls.,
Androcles
Space-time continuum,
Sue...
Interesting Equation,
Joe Fischer
Gravity Magic,
Joe Fischer
Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter,
Barbara Schwarz
relativity problems,
glucose
Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...),
glucose
Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Androcles
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Androcles
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Sue...
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Androcles
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Sue...
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Androcles
- Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.,
Dirk Van de moortel
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics",
Egap
driving at the speed of light,
shevek
The face on Earth to match the face on Mars,
Androcles
Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe,
Bilge
Re: Conversion of Physics Students into Zombies,
Androcles
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity",
Egap
"The emptyness between points", by jOE FiSHER,
brian a m stuckless
one hundred years of wrong relativity? whats goen on here!?,
uucp
Dishman's dishonesty,
Androcles
Re: An immortal fumble by Dork Van de merde,
Jim Black
visual rulers,
beda pietanza
the emptyness between points.. Joe Fischer,
brian a m stuckless
Euclid's conundrum - Space-,
Joe Fischer
Truth Regarding Albert Einstein,
Nathan
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Ytrap
Cyber world,
pl . moyne
"General Relativity Examined",
Ytrap
Re: Einstein in 2010,
John Kennaugh
Unnrecoverable lost ticks,
Joe Fischer
hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
catlover
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bilge
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Androcles
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Androcles
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
wolf
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bilge
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bilge
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Thomas Heger
- Message not available
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
jem
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
AllYou!
- Message not available
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bilge
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
wolf
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
Bilge
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena,
glucose
Re: TO: Barbara Schwarz- GOD & SCIENTOLOGY,
Joe Fischer
New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Sue...
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Sue...
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
xray4abc
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
xray4abc
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Androcles
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Sue...
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Androcles
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Sue...
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Androcles
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Sue...
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Androcles
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Autymn D. C.
- Re: New Light On The Speed of Light,
Androcles
Re: Which one are you ?,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
We can only see the past, never the present, since it takes time for the observed image to reach our eyes.,
Len Gaasenbeek
Free fall and clocks ?,
we_pretty
Time dilation calc,
tuvok
Flash from a Black Hole's Cannibal Act,
Sue...
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
Trats
Lienard-Wiechert potential,
David McAnally
PSUEdoo-"simultaneity" (defined).!!,
brian a m stuckless
Re: Why is SR and LET have identical math??????,
Joe Fischer
if gravity were a field,
corleone
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Sue...
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Sue...
- Re: if gravity were a field,
catlover
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
uucp02938
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Sue...
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Joe Fischer
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
wolf
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Joe Fischer
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Joe Fischer
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Joe Fischer
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Joe Fischer
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
wolf
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
wolf
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
wolf
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
wolf
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
uucp
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: if gravity were a field,
uucp
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
glucose
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
PD
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Androcles
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: if gravity were a field,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: if gravity were a field,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: if gravity were a field,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
O'Barr: SR Primer!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire,
Thomas Smid
Perpetual motion,
Nick Summers
Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart,
brian a m stuckless
Schrodinger Aether vs Michelson-Morley,
manofsan
Differences in stellar collapse - Divergent Matter - GR,
Joe Fischer
Drop in number of posts,
Joe Fischer
Re: Rates of Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field,
Norbert
Simple question,
Ali
The Properties of the Aether,
Trats
Re: Scientist says neutron stars, not black holes, at center of gal...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Brits take up smoking again.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon",
John Kennaugh
Gravity Essay Prizes, less than four months to deadline,
Joe Fischer
mfkzt, Philosophers Stone or Exotic Matter,
Gary
Re: No More Black Holes,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Gravity Research Foundation,
Joe Fischer
What gravity is and how it works,
Joe Fischer
Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Bill Hobba
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Tom Roberts
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
Androcles
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR,
PD
Goal: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
oriel36
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Thomas Heger
- Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation,
Joe Fischer
Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Black Knight
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Norbert
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Russell
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Bob
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
harrlin
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
John Baez
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Sue...
- Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Androcles
Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: Twin Paradox Question,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Twin Paradox Question,
Martin Hogbin
Re: Twin Paradox Question,
ESKI
Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
vanep
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Message not available
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ole D. Rughede
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Aetherist
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- hobba is a gay,
argon
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Aetherist
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Aetherist
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Aetherist
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Aetherist
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Message not available
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Androcles
- John Parker's anticonceptions,
shuba
- Re: John Parker's anticonceptions,
Androcles
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
- Message not available
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
shuba
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
jem
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Jem
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Harry
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bill Hobba
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Bilge
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
Mike
Re: Hobba's misconceptions,
PD
proof for the existence of ether,
semilatus rectum
Re: Unified Physics and New Blackhole >> IQ in Australia,
relativitybeyondeinstein
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes,
ESKI
Re: Scientist says neutron stars, not black holes, at center of galaxies (Forwarded),
Joe Fischer
Re: This must be the funniest NG,
Dastardly Fiend
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Drac
a proposal for topology of space,
Thomas Heger
Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Koobee Wublee
- Albert Einstein's though experiment has no data or logical meaning.,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
stephen
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Jerry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Jerry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Challenge to Tom Roberts,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Aetherist
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
vern
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Peter
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
Harry
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal,
oriel36
Re: [OT] Re: The World of Einstein,
Howard
Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Joe Fischer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Trats
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Androcles
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Androcles
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?",
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: "Observer Dependant" vs "Invariant",
Joe Fischer
underestanding relativity,
a
What is the debate all about?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: What is the debate all about?,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: What is the debate all about?,
Dastardly Fiend
speed higher than light,
Jean DAVID
Michelson and Morley,
Feico Nater
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Harry
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
ianparker2
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Feico Nater
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
ianparker2
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Feico
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Randy Poe
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Feico Nater
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Michelson and Morley,
John Kennaugh
Hypocritical, arrogant, illogical relativist.,
Dastardly Fiend
Newton and Einstein,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
xxein
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
bad news
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bilge
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
semilatus rectum
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Harry
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bilge
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Harry
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Mike
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Harry
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Bilge
- Re: Newton and Einstein,
Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Newton and Einstein,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...,
bad news
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Education tools,
liska273
where did everbody go,
bad news
- Re: where did everbody go,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: where did everbody go,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: where did everbody go,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: where did everbody go,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: where did everbody go,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: where did everbody go,
AndyCav
- Re: where did everbody go,
Bilge
- Message not available
- Re: where did everbody go,
Mike
- Re: where did everbody go,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: where did everbody go,
Bill Hobba
- Re: where did everbody go,
Mike
rulers reciprocal measurements,
beda pietanza
Re: The MMX Revisited,
Joe Fischer
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Doog
Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space".,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Sue...
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
- Re: Stripping away the bull shit,
PD
electron collision,
Vollane
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity",
X48
Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there,
Autymn D. C.
E = mc^2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Eric Gisse
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
Eric Gisse
- Re: E = mc^2,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: E = mc^2,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: E = mc^2,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: E = mc^2,
Joe Fischer
- Re: E = mc^2,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: E = mc^2,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: E = mc^2,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: E = mc^2,
Bilge
- Re: E = mc^2,
Bilge
Re: E = mc^2,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: E = mc^2,
Harry
Re: What Did Eddington Prove in 1919?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Sources of confusion about Relativity,
Joe Fischer
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations",
X48
Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks,
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
electron observation,
Vollane
Merry-go-round,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?,
Joe Fischer
Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: FASCISM , was Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2,
Joe Fischer
Re: Update on history of relativity,
Dirk Van de moortel
Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bill Hobba
Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Vollane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Vollane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
dennismccarthy
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
dennismccarthy
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Vollane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Message not available
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Peter Kinane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Peter Kinane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
markwh04
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Androcles
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
shuba
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
bad news
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
David Thomson
Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
FrediFizzx
Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists,
Eric Gisse
Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins,
dennismccarthy
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?",
X48
Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Tom Roberts
Re: Trying to Understand Relativity,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Ether theory AND expanding Earth hit mainstream journals....,
dennismccarthy
Re: Ether theory AND expanding Earth hit mainstream journals....,
em
Re: Revised ether theory,
Joe Fischer
Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Light is a DUAL wave,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: again space again new space,
resneli
Theoretical Verses,
Symmetry Observer
Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Androcles
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
argon
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Androcles
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Bilge
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications,
Symmetry Observer
Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Every now and then...,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: G the gravitational constant,
Tom Roberts
Re: on bending of space time,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation,
Harry
"The Matter of "Dark Matter",
X84
Re: relativity? paradox?,
Sue...
Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Message not available
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
FrediFizzx
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Randy Poe
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
stephen
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
stephen
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists - Bilge enlightens us,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists - Bilge enlightens us,
Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists - Bilge enlightens us,
Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dastardly Fiend
Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
PD
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
PD
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
PD
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
PD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Approximating the Universe,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
jem
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Mike
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ben Rudiak-Gould
