sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• The EINSTEIN-BOHR UNIVERSAL ABSLOUTE, Jeff
• Determining direction of motion using relativity., GGB667
  • Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity., Randy Poe
• training tip #6, tankgirl23@xxxxxxxxx
• The Multidimensional Man, jnadiaz
• Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Retne
• Massless particles and photons., avergon
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Massless particles and photons., avergon
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., Bill Hobba
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Tom Roberts
    • Re: Massless particles and photons., Y.Porat
• O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether, Hexenmeister
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman
  • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., avergon
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sue...
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Harry
  • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., avergon
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Hexenmeister
• "The Arrow of Time", Retne
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", AllYou!
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", avergon
    • Re: "The Arrow of Time", BernardZ
      • Re: "The Arrow of Time", G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military), xxein
• Re: Is Quantum Gravity Bad Physics?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Evird
  • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", avergon
    • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", dej4
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", dej4
• "Self field theory" SFT - non existant, Viktor . Sauer
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., xxein
  • WILSON DROOL, Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., JanPB
    • Re: Why c is not a velocity., Hexenmeister
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., JanPB
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., JanPB
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., sal
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., sal
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Tom Roberts
      • HUMPTY ROBERTS CHANGES THE MEANING OF WORDS AGAIN., Hexenmeister
      • Pathology report., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Harry
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., kenseto
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
• Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
    • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
  • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
• Re: we dont do other planets anymore, The Ghost In The Machine
• Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, dej4
      • Message not available
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, dej4
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, xxein
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, xxein
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Harry
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Thomas Heger
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bilge
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, surrealistic-dream
• Re: big silence in science, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Re: big silence in science, Bill Hobba
      • Message not available
      • Re: big silence in science, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: big silence in science, dej4
  • Re: big silence in science, Bilge
• johnreed take 20, randamajor
  • Re: johnreed take 20, Bill Hobba
    • Re: johnreed take 20, randamajor
  • Re: johnreed take 20, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: johnreed take 20, randamajor
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Evird
• UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), relativitybeyondeinstein
  • Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), Joe Fischer
    • Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), relativitybeyondeinstein
• The IDIOT Mickey Wilson., Hexenmeister
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
• Questions², nuwsguy
  • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², Randy Poe
  • Re: Questions², dej4
    • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
      • Re: Questions², dej4
      • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
      • Re: Questions², Randy Poe
      • Re: Questions², dej4
      • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
  • Re: Questions², Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
  • Re: Questions², Bill Hobba
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Bill Hobba
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Evird
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", dej4
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
    • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
    • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Bilge
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
  • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Sue...
• O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Bill Hobba
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, JanPB
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, shevek
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, vanep
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Harry
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Evird
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", JanPB
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Hexenmeister
• What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • WAVES IN MERCURY - ROBERTS., Hexenmeister
    • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
  • Re: What is LET?, Harry
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
  • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • ROBERTS WON'T ADMIT HIS RELIGIOUS CONVCTIONS, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, sal
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
  • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? Historical interest, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? Idiocy., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? IDiOCY, of course., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? --- BULLSHIT, Just like ROBERTS, SR and GR., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? RADIO WAVES ARE NOT COHERENT - ROBERTS., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? LIGHT MOVES IN STRAIGHT LINES -- ROBERTS, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: What is LET?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • TOM SHITHEAD ROBERTS LEARNS SOMETHING., Hexenmeister
• Re: test, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, sal
  • Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, Androcles
    • Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, Eric Gisse
• One for Dirk, jcon
  • Re: One for Dirk, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: One for Dirk, Androcles
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Evird
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", dej4
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Paul B. Andersen
• Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Zach
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Sue...
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Androcles
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Androcles
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., vanep
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Bilge
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Randy Poe
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Eric Gisse
• We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), lamoore0777
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), lamoore0777
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bill Hobba
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Androcles
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bill Hobba
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), FrediFizzx
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: DVM bites again!, AllYou!
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bilge
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Androcles
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Joe Fischer
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
• Re: Relativity., Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: Relativity., dej4
  • Re: Relativity., Androcles
    • Re: Relativity., Len Gaasenbeek
      • Re: Relativity., Androcles
  • Re: Relativity., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Relativity., JanPB
    • Re: Relativity., Androcles
      • Re: Relativity., surrealistic-dream
• Re: temperature of an atom, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Howard
  • Message not available
    • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
    • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
    • Re: temperature of an atom, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Evird
  • Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, extremetech2
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, syju100
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, extremetech2
    • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., Mdmeenken
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., Randy Poe
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Heim-Theory Research Group, Tim Murphy
  • Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Burkhard Heim: Take a leap into hyperspace, Tim Murphy
• Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, xxein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, Eric Gisse
  • Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, Bilge
• Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Spaceship Question, xxein
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Spaceship Question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
    • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Len Gaasenbeek
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
    • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, vanep
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
  • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• O'Barr: physical gravity., Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr: physical gravity., Joe Fischer
  • Re: O'Barr: physical gravity., Hexenmeister
• Time question, Howard
  • Re: Time question, Sue...
  • Re: Time question, Wugi
  • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Time question, kenseto
    • Re: Time question, Howard
      • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Bilge
    • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Time question, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Time question, dej4
      • Re: Time question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time question, JanPB
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time question, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Time question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time question, dej4
      • Re: Time question, PD
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Bilge
  • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
    • Re: Time question, Howard
      • Re: Time question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Time question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Time question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
    • Re: Time question, Bilge
  • Re: Time question, pixel_a_ted
• SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Bilge
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
    • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Hexenmeister
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Evird
  • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", JanPB
      • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Gr and red shifts, brad
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, sal
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, sal
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
• What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, G. L. Bradford
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Aetherist
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Harry
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: Bilge is a "crackpot"., AllYou!
      • Re: AllYou! is a sociopath with no life, Bilge
      • Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Joe Fischer
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Randy Poe
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Randy Poe
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., joeyG007usa
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Bilge
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, YBM
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Joe Fischer
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: van Moortel defines a "crackpot"!, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Aetherist
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, PD
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, PD
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Koobee Wublee
• The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real, physicsproblem
  • Re: The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real, Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity (to Ole D.R) et al, lamoore0777
• PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., oriel36
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hexenmeister
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Sue...
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hexenmeister
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on: Notice the corrolary.., Hontas Farmer
• calculating x', t', rbwinn3
  • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
  • Re: calculating x', t', Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: calculating x', t', shuba
    • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
  • Re: calculating x', t', Hexenmeister
• The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
  • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Joe Fischer
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Joe Fischer
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
  • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, JanPB
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, JanPB
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, JanPB
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Hexenmeister
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Cult: More Years of Money Making, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Einstein's Cult: More Years of Money Making, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• FAQ, AndyCav
  • Re: FAQ, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: FAQ, AndyCav
    • Re: FAQ, Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: FAQ, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Eternal Triangle:- Politics, Science and Religion., Arthur Knight
• Re: Lifewave Energy Enhancer, Bill Hobba
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Randy Poe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Androcles
    • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Sue...
    • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Sue...
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, surrealistic-dream
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, surrealistic-dream
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, surrealistic-dream
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer, avergon
• a few simple questions (from a layman), lamoore0777
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Eric Gisse
    • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), lamoore0777
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Joe Fischer
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), lamoore0777
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Joe Fischer
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Eric Gisse
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Eric Gisse
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Eric Gisse
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Joe Fischer
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Hexenmeister
    • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Eric Gisse
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Ole D. Rughede
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), RP
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Mdmeenken
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), FrediFizzx
    • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Hexenmeister
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Mdmeenken
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Hexenmeister
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Mdmeenken
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Martin Hogbin
    • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Mdmeenken
      • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman), Martin Hogbin
• Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?, Sue...
    • Re: Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?, Androcles
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Nom
  • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Sue...
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia., Sue...
  • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Sue...
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing, Sue...
• Harry and the Natural Philosophy Alliance, shuba
  • Re: Harry and the Natural Philosophy Alliance, surrealistic-dream
• what is better for relativity, Heckuva
  • Re: what is better for relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: what is better for relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: what is better for relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: what is better for relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: what is better for relativity, Sue...
      • Re: what is better for relativity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: what is better for relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: what is better for relativity, Eric Gisse
      • Re: what is better for relativity, Bilge
  • Re: what is better for relativity, Sue...
  • Re: what is better for relativity, Paul Cardinale
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Nom
• excellent free website on relativity and light, yoyodog
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Hexenmeister
    • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Mdmeenken
    • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Hexenmeister
  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Russell
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: The H&K Flying Circus, Androcles
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Nom
• Geometric Form, St.M
  • Re: Geometric Form, shevek
  • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Geometric Form, Cosmik Debris
      • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Geometric Form, Mike
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Mike
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Heckuva
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, Peter Kinane
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, G. L. Bradford
      • Re: Geometric Form, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Geometric Form, St.M
  • Re: Geometric Form, Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Relative Motion From Absolute Motions, YBM
  • Re: Relative Motion From Absolute Motions, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, PD
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Heckuva Job
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Tom Roberts
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, PD
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Tom Roberts
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Heckuva
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bill Hobba
      • Message not available
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bill Hobba
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Jon Bell
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Tom Roberts
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bill Hobba
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Tom Roberts
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bilge
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bilge
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bilge
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Tom Roberts
    • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Heckuva Job
  • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bilge
    • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Heckuva Job
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Bilge
      • Re: fermions at c, still confussed, Heckuva Job
• What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?, shuba
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?, Bilge
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, rbwinn3
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, rbwinn3
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, rbwinn3
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, rbwinn3
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, dej4
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Bilge
    • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, AndyCav
      • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Harry
  • Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?, Dirk Van de moortel
• Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem, dseppala
  • Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem, dseppala
  • Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem, dseppala
      • Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem, Dirk Van de moortel
• PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Peter Kinane
  • Re: PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Peter Kinane
• Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Randy Poe
• Distant objects, glad . gys
  • Re: Distant objects, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Distant objects, Sue...
  • Re: Distant objects, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Distant objects, shevek
  • Re: Distant objects, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Distant objects, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Distant objects, glad . gys
  • Re: Distant objects, John Kennaugh
• Discussions on SR - QFT, AndyCav
  • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Joe Fischer
    • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, AndyCav
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, xxein
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, AndyCav
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, xxein
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, xxein
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bilge
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bilge
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Ralf
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Androcles
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bilge
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, AndyCav
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bilge
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Bilge
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Androcles
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, dej4
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Sue...
  • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Discussions on SR - QFT, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Shakespeare And Einstein SONNET by Peter D Rodgers -physics & literature, relativitybeyondeinstein
• Help with Twins Paradox variation, dseppala
  • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, rbwinn3
    • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
    • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Sue...
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, rbwinn3
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, dej4
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, stephen
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, rbwinn3
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, rbwinn3
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, rbwinn3
      • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation, The Ghost In The Machine
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Nom
  • Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Randy Poe
• does light travel forever?, ck19bla
  • Re: does light travel forever?, Sue...
  • Re: does light travel forever?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: does light travel forever?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • Re: does light travel forever?, PD
    • Re: does light travel forever?, ck19bla
      • Re: does light travel forever?, Sue...
      • Re: does light travel forever?, PD
      • Re: does light travel forever?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: does light travel forever?, shevek
• SFT vs QFT and GR, tfleming1
• String theory questions for a work of fiction, CJ
• For Hanson., Hexenmeister
  • Re: For Hanson., Areader
    • Re: For Hanson., Hexenmeister
    • Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., YBM
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., JanPB
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., JanPB
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., YBM
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., YBM
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., PD
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., PD
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., PD
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., PD
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., PD
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., JanPB
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., JanPB
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., JanPB
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., YBM
      • Re: Solid Grasp of Reality., Randy Poe
    • Re: For Hanson., O'Really
• Sonic boom java applet, Hexenmeister
• Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., lamoore0777
  • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., dej4
  • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Bill Hobba
    • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., lamoore0777
      • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Bill Hobba
      • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Bill Hobba
      • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Ole D. Rughede
  • Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)..., Sue...
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Nom
  • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", JanPB
• Einstein's Mistakes, shuba
  • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
    • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Any SPACE where a particle is, is NOT empty.!!, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Randy Poe
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
  • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
    • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
    • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, JanPB
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, JanPB
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Androcles
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, RP
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Sue...
  • Re: Einstein's Mistakes, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics, RP
    • Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics, RP
  • Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics, Tom Roberts
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Woleb
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sue...
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
    • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Jerry
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Jerry
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Mike
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Mike
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", dej4
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", dej4
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Eric Gisse
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Joe Fischer
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Joe Fischer
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Joe Fischer
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Hexenmeister
      • IGNORANT ROBERTS DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WAVE AND TIDE., Hexenmeister
      • IGNORANT ROBERTS DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WAVE AND TIDE., Hexenmeister
      • MORON ROBERTS INVENTS "CLOCK RATE", Hexenmeister
      • ROBERTS of LUCENT IS A FUCKIN' LIAR, Hexenmeister
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Joe Fischer
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Hexenmeister
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Joe Fischer
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", surrealistic-dream
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", G. L. Bradford
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Jerry
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", PD
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tom Roberts
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
      • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", John Kennaugh
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", dej4
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", surrealistic-dream
• Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, oriel36
    • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, The old Sorcerer
  • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, Sue...
  • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, Bilge
    • Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions, oriel36
• Re: another proof that we go back in time, Brit
• The Un-Photo electric effect, Sue...
  • Re: The Un-Photo electric effect, The old Sorcerer
    • Re: The Un-Photo electric effect, Sue...
      • Re: The Un-Photo electric effect, The old Sorcerer
• 2nd law of thermodynamics also wrong, double precision
  • Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics also wrong, Joe Fischer
• Mass of potential energy, Matthew Isleb
  • Re: Mass of potential energy, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Mass of potential energy, double precision
  • Re: Mass of potential energy, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Mass of potential energy, Matthew Isleb
      • Re: Mass of potential energy, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Mass of potential energy, RP
  • Re: Mass of potential energy, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Mass of potential energy, Hexenmeister
• "The Einstein Hoax", Woleb
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", dej4
    • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", JanPB
• speed of matter, big magician
• the speed of electron, big magician
  • Re: the speed of electron, Randy Poe
    • Re: the speed of electron, big magician
  • Re: the speed of electron, Tom Roberts
    • Re: the speed of electron, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: the speed of electron, double precision
    • Re: the speed of electron, double precision
      • Re: the speed of electron, Stan Liou
      • Re: the speed of electron, Hexenmeister
      • Re: the speed of electron, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: the speed of electron, double precision
      • Re: the speed of electron, Tom Roberts
      • Re: the speed of electron, RP
      • Message not available
      • Re: the speed of electron, Sue...
  • Re: the speed of electron, Sue...
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, Bill Hobba
  • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, big magician
    • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
    • Message not available
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, Heckuva
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, PD
  • Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?, Eric Gisse
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Julian Becker
  • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, dej4
  • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The old Sorcerer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, big magician
    • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, abridged
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, abridged
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Bilge
      • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Heckuva Job
  • Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Puppet_Sock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, dej4
• QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE QUANTIUM LOVE ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455, switzerland qunatium computer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE QUANTIUM LOVE ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455, switzerland qunatium computer
• Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, PD
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, double precision
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, PD
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Gerald L. O'Barr
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Pmb
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Bilge
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
  • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, surrealistic-dream
  • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Sue...
    • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, soup.or.string@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, Sue...
      • Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!, The old Sorcerer
• SR view of rotating cylinder collision, dseppala
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Sue...
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Bilge
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Tom Roberts
  • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Todd
    • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, dseppala
      • Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision, Todd
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005, randamajor
  • Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005, randamajor
    • Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005, Joe Fischer
      • Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005, randamajor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005, Joe Fischer
• Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Mike
    • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Bilge
  • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, stephen
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, stephen
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Jerry
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Joe Fischer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Randy Poe
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, big magician
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Randy Poe
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, big magician
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Randy Poe
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, double precision
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, big magician
      • Message not available
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, PD
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, double precision
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, PD
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, double precision
      • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, stephen
    • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Mike
    • Re: Real Problems nobody talks about, Sue...
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, vern
  • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, The old Sorcerer
  • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
  • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
    • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, vern
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, vern
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, vern
    • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue...
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS
      • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue...
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Spaceman
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Woleb
  • Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", JanPB
    • Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", The old Sorcerer
      • Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", dej4
  • Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", dej4
• Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?, Muddy
  • Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?, Sue...
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, shuba
  • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, John Kennaugh
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Harry
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, harry
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Harry
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, John Kennaugh
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Harry
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, sal
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Androcles
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, sal
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Tom Roberts
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, sal
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Tom Roberts
      • ROBERTS IS SORRY (He will be!), Hexenmeister
      • DROOLING ROBERTS DROOLS AGAIN., Hexenmeister
  • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
  • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Spaceman
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
      • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
  • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Sue...
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Androcles
    • Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Russell
• sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Admin
  • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Eric Gisse
    • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Bill Hobba
  • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Sue...
  • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided., Areader
• Inmate assembly notice, Joe Fischer
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Woleb
  • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Richard Miller
    • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Dirk Van de moortel
• Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
  • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Can black holes ever form?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Can black holes ever form?, PD
    • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, PD
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, PD
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Russell
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Marko Rauhamaa
      • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Can black holes ever form?, jem
  • Re: Can black holes ever form?, Bilge
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light, Symmetry Observer
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Sue...
  • Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, vanep
• Re: Twin Paradox Question, ESKI
  • Re: Twin Paradox Question, Bilge
    • Re: Twin Paradox Question, ESKI
      • Re: Twin Paradox Question, Bilge
• Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
  • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
  • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Gravitons and black holes, xxein
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
  • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Bilge
    • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Bilge
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Bilge
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, th234
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Thomas Heger
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons and black holes, Bill Hobba
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Woleb
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Harry
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS corrections, mluttgens
• Re: gravitational-wave sources (was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), Joe Fischer
  • Re: gravitational-wave sources (was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), Sue...
• Fastest Manmade Meteor, Joe Fischer
• A theory, Henry Haapalainen
  • Re: A theory, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: A theory, Bilge
  • Re: A theory, Ashish
    • Re: A theory, Henry Haapalainen
• Encourage a nutcase, reply to him, Joe Fischer
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Paul B. Andersen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong., Eric Gisse
• what a question?, y . s . rajath
  • Re: what a question?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: what a question?, PD
  • Re: what a question?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Paradox of Zeno", Woleb
• into another dimension, change my membership
  • Re: into another dimension, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Gravity/Coulomb processor, Sue...
• To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
    • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), David McAnally
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), David McAnally
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), The old Sorcerer
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), The old Sorcerer
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Hexenmeister
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
    • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst), Sue...
• Re: Matter, Energy and Time, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Matter, Energy and Time, sjtjohnson2004
    • Re: Matter, Energy and Time, Ron Poteet
• Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, xxein
    • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, xxein
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, xxein
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Message not available
    • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL, Eric Gisse
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, xxein
    • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
    • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The old Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The old Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The old Sorcerer
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The old Sorcerer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, The old Sorcerer
  • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Paul B. Andersen
    • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!, Hexenmeister
• Re: Yale runs remote controlled flies, Sue...
• question, pvc
  • Re: question, Ashwin
    • Re: question, saamaan
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Julian Becker
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, JanPB
  • Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Julian Becker
  • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Der alte Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Russell
    • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Russell
      • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Bilge
      • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation., Dirk Van de moortel
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Einsteinhoax
• tesla's dimensions, terms of service
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Rapep
• blah blah blah (relativistic version), Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • Re: blah blah blah (relativistic version), The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: blah blah blah (relativistic version), abridged email
• thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons, change my membership
  • Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons, Eric Gisse
    • Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons, terms of service
  • Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons, shuba
    • Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons, Dirk Van de moortel
• GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again, change my membership
  • Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again, Eric Gisse
  • Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again, Mike
  • Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• dilation of time, Jean DAVID
  • Re: dilation of time, Bill Hobba
  • Re: dilation of time, Sue...
  • Re: dilation of time, RP
• Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton, Ken S. Tucker
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Rapep
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Corrections to Special Relativity", Nom
    • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Hexenmeister
• Cause of relativity, satish
  • Re: Cause of relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Cause of relativity, PD
  • Re: Cause of relativity, satish
  • Re: Cause of relativity, rbwinn3
  • Re: Cause of relativity, rbwinn3
    • Re: Cause of relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Cause of relativity, Sue...
• Triplet Paradox, phyx
  • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
    • Re: Triplet Paradox, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Triplet Paradox, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, stephen
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Androcles
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Wugi
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Wugi
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Wugi
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Wugi
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, stephen
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, snapdragon31
      • Message not available
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Daniel Weston
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Message not available
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Daniel Weston
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, shuba
      • Message not available
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Bilge
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet Paradox, phyx
  • Re: Triplet Paradox, Sue...
  • Re: Triplet Paradox, Martin Hogbin
• Triplet's Paradox, phyx
  • Re: Triplet's Paradox, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
    • Re: Triplet's Paradox, phyx
    • Re: Triplet's Paradox, terms of service
    • Re: Triplet's Paradox, Russell
      • Re: Triplet's Paradox, Sue...
• Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes, ESKI
  • Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes, Bilge
• Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
  • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, xxein
    • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, xxein
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, xxein
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, xxein
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, xxein
      • Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method, Sue...
• Re: Philosophy and the prob in and solut to SR's two postulates, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Philosophy and the prob in and solut to SR's two postulates, Peter Kinane
• Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, John Baez
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Mike
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Jerry
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, stephen
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Joe Fischer
    • Newton's inverse-square force law from Divergent Matter :-), Joe Fischer
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Mike
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, demeo
    • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, lokiliesmith
  • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, PD
    • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, lokiliesmith
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, PD
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, lokiliesmith
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, PD
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, the true George Hammond
    • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, lokiliesmith
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, George Hammond
      • Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD, Gary Eickmeier
• Ne vous laissez pas raconter n'importe quoi :, jean . teremetz
• Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, change my membership
  • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories, Ilja Schmelzer
• One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: One hour physics lesson., Sue...
    • Re: One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Sue...
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Sue...
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Sue...
  • Re: One hour physics lesson., Bilge
    • Re: One hour physics lesson., Russell
      • Re: One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: One hour physics lesson., JanPB
    • Re: One hour physics lesson., Der alte Hexenmeister
• one hundred years of wrong relativity, my sorry ass
• tha major question yaer 2006, my sorry ass
  • Re: tha major question yaer 2006, Joe Fischer
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Serif
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Tom Roberts
    • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sue...
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sue...
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sue...
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, my sorry ass
    • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Autymn D. C.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
    • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, shevek
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Autymn D. C.
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, JanPB
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Androcles
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
  • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
    • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity, Bilge
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?, Autymn D. C.
• can u help in this...., vignesh
  • Re: can u help in this...., Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: can u help in this...., Randy Poe
    • Re: can u help in this...., Joe Fischer
      • Re: can u help in this...., Randy Poe
      • Re: can u help in this...., Joe Fischer
  • Re: can u help in this...., my sorry ass
  • Re: can u help in this...., snapdragon31
• coordinate distance, Harvey
  • Re: coordinate distance, xxein
  • Re: coordinate distance, Sue...
  • Re: coordinate distance, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: coordinate distance, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: coordinate distance, Harvey
      • Re: coordinate distance, Sue...
      • Re: coordinate distance, The old Sorcerer
      • Re: coordinate distance, Sue...
      • Re: coordinate distance, The old Sorcerer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL, Daniel Weston
  • Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL, Bilge
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Serif
• The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
  • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, xxein
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Harry
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, xxein
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Randy Poe
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Bilge
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, PD
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Autymn D. C.
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Autymn D. C.
  • Message not available
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Eric Gisse
  • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, John Kennaugh
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Joe Fischer
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, John Kennaugh
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Joe Fischer
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, John Kennaugh
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Bilge
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, John Kennaugh
      • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory, kenseto
• Re: errata corrige, Bilge
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Ole D. Rughede
    • Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source, Ole D. Rughede
• "Gravity", Serif
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Gravity", Nom
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials., Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials., Der alte Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials., Jerry
• Magnetic Fields are Nothing Like Gravity, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Magnetic Fields are Nothing Like Gravity, Sue...
• Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
  • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Jerry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Jerry
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Androcles
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Henri Wilson's program, Hexenmeister
• Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
    • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Y.Porat
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Y.Porat
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Y.Porat
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
  • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Bilge
    • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Bilge
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, my sorry ass
      • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Bilge
  • Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??, Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists., Tom Roberts
  • Re: A little challenge for relativists., Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: A little challenge for relativists., surrealistic-dream
      • Re: A little challenge for relativists., Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Three Ring Circus, skearney
  • Re: Three Ring Circus, Sue...
    • Re: Three Ring Circus, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Sue...
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Der alte Hexenmeister
    • Re: Three Ring Circus, skearney
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Sue...
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, skearney
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Sue...
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Der alte Hexenmeister
      • Re: Three Ring Circus, Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame, GSS
  • Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame, GSS
      • Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame, Tom Roberts
• Re: consider this, Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, surrealistic-dream
    • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, Bilge
  • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, PD
    • Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!, my sorry ass
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
  • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Jem
    • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, jem
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, jem
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
  • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Bilge
      • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Hobba's misconceptions, harry
• 100 Years, gadge
  • Re: 100 Years, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: 100 Years, Peter Kinane
      • Re: 100 Years, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: 100 Years, Bilge
  • Re: 100 Years, Eric Gisse
    • Re: 100 Years, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: 100 Years, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: 100 Years, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: 100 Years, Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!, Y.Porat
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO, Jerry
  • Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO, Jerry
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bill Hobba
  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, surrealistic-dream
    • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bill Hobba
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bilge
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Autymn D. C.
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bilge
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bilge
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bilge
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Bilge
      • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Autymn D. C.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, David McAnally
    • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy, Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Lienard-Wiechert potential, David McAnally
• Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
    • Re: 'gravitons', Thomas Heger
      • Re: 'gravitons', Joe Fischer
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Y.Porat
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Y.Porat
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Y.Porat
      • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
      • Re: 'gravitons', Thomas Heger
      • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
      • Re: 'gravitons', Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Thomas Heger
      • Re: 'gravitons', Daniel G. Emilio
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Daniel G. Emilio
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Daniel G. Emilio
      • Re: 'gravitons', Sue...
      • Re: 'gravitons', Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Latter Day MMX, Gerald L. O'Barr
    • Re: Latter Day MMX, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Latter Day MMX, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Latter Day MMX, Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD
    • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Joe Fischer
    • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Joe Fischer
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, surrealistic-dream
  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD