sci.physics.relativity

• Date Index

---

• The EINSTEIN-BOHR UNIVERSAL ABSLOUTE, Jeff
• Determining direction of motion using relativity., GGB667
  • Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity., Randy Poe
• training tip #6, tankgirl23@xxxxxxxxx
• The Multidimensional Man, jnadiaz
• Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Retne
• Massless particles and photons., avergon
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Massless particles and photons., avergon
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., Bill Hobba
      • Re: Massless particles and photons., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Massless particles and photons., Tom Roberts
    • Re: Massless particles and photons., Y.Porat
• O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether, Hexenmeister
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman
  • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., avergon
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sue...
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Harry
  • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., avergon
    • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Hexenmeister
• "The Arrow of Time", Retne
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", AllYou!
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", avergon
    • Re: "The Arrow of Time", BernardZ
      • Re: "The Arrow of Time", G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military), xxein
• Re: Is Quantum Gravity Bad Physics?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Evird
  • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", avergon
    • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", dej4
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", dej4
• "Self field theory" SFT - non existant, Viktor . Sauer
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., xxein
  • WILSON DROOL, Hexenmeister
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., JanPB
    • Re: Why c is not a velocity., Hexenmeister
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., JanPB
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., JanPB
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., sal
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Tom Roberts
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., sal
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame., Tom Roberts
      • HUMPTY ROBERTS CHANGES THE MEANING OF WORDS AGAIN., Hexenmeister
      • Pathology report., Hexenmeister
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Harry
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., kenseto
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Sue...
      • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame., Hexenmeister
• Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
    • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, xxein
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
  • Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift, Sue...
• Re: we dont do other planets anymore, The Ghost In The Machine
• Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, dej4
      • Message not available
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, dej4
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, xxein
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, xxein
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bill Hobba
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Harry
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
    • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Sue...
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Joe Fischer
      • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Thomas Heger
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, Bilge
  • Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity, surrealistic-dream
• Re: big silence in science, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Message not available
    • Re: big silence in science, Bill Hobba
      • Message not available
      • Re: big silence in science, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: big silence in science, dej4
  • Re: big silence in science, Bilge
• johnreed take 20, randamajor
  • Re: johnreed take 20, Bill Hobba
    • Re: johnreed take 20, randamajor
  • Re: johnreed take 20, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: johnreed take 20, randamajor
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Evird
• UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), relativitybeyondeinstein
  • Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), Joe Fischer
    • Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers), relativitybeyondeinstein
• The IDIOT Mickey Wilson., Hexenmeister
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Eric Gisse
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, Bill Hobba
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Message not available
      • Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW, The Ghost In The Machine
• Questions², nuwsguy
  • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
      • Re: Questions², Randy Poe
  • Re: Questions², dej4
    • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
      • Re: Questions², dej4
      • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
      • Re: Questions², Randy Poe
      • Re: Questions², dej4
      • Re: Questions², Joe Fischer
  • Re: Questions², Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Questions², Hexenmeister
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
  • Re: Questions², Bill Hobba
    • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
      • Re: Questions², Bill Hobba
      • Re: Questions², nuwsguy
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Evird
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", dej4
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
    • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
    • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Bilge
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, PD
  • Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?, Sue...
• O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Bill Hobba
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, JanPB
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, shevek
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, vanep
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, vanep
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, PD
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Harry
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, th234
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Thomas Heger
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
  • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
    • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Gerald L. O'Barr
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, Hexenmeister
      • Re: O'Barr>Reality!, oriel36
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Evird
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", JanPB
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Hexenmeister
• What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Harry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • WAVES IN MERCURY - ROBERTS., Hexenmeister
    • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
  • Re: What is LET?, Harry
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
  • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • ROBERTS WON'T ADMIT HIS RELIGIOUS CONVCTIONS, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, sal
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What is LET?, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
  • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? Historical interest, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? Idiocy., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? IDiOCY, of course., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET? --- BULLSHIT, Just like ROBERTS, SR and GR., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? RADIO WAVES ARE NOT COHERENT - ROBERTS., Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET? LIGHT MOVES IN STRAIGHT LINES -- ROBERTS, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Jerry
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, RP
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: What is LET?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
    • Re: What is LET?, dej4
  • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
    • Re: What is LET?, Aetherist
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: What is LET?, Bilge
      • Re: What is LET?, shevek
      • Re: What is LET?, Joe Fischer
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, dej4
      • Re: What is LET?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: What is LET?, Russell
      • TOM SHITHEAD ROBERTS LEARNS SOMETHING., Hexenmeister
• Re: test, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, sal
  • Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, Androcles
    • Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?, Eric Gisse
• One for Dirk, jcon
  • Re: One for Dirk, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: One for Dirk, Androcles
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Evird
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", dej4
  • Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Paul B. Andersen
• Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Zach
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Sue...
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Androcles
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Androcles
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Koobee Wublee
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., vanep
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Bilge
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
  • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Androcles
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Randy Poe
      • Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD., Eric Gisse
• We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), lamoore0777
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), lamoore0777
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bill Hobba
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Androcles
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bill Hobba
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), FrediFizzx
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: DVM bites again!, AllYou!
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Bilge
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Androcles
  • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
    • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Joe Fischer
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), PD
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot), AllYou!
• Re: Relativity., Len Gaasenbeek
  • Re: Relativity., dej4
  • Re: Relativity., Androcles
    • Re: Relativity., Len Gaasenbeek
      • Re: Relativity., Androcles
  • Re: Relativity., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Relativity., JanPB
    • Re: Relativity., Androcles
      • Re: Relativity., surrealistic-dream
• Re: temperature of an atom, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Howard
  • Message not available
    • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
      • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
    • Message not available
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Henry Haapalainen
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Randy Poe
      • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: temperature of an atom, Bilge
    • Re: temperature of an atom, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Evird
  • Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, extremetech2
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, syju100
  • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?, extremetech2
    • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., Mdmeenken
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., Randy Poe
      • Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Heim-Theory Research Group, Tim Murphy
  • Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Burkhard Heim: Take a leap into hyperspace, Tim Murphy
• Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, xxein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, Eric Gisse
  • Re: total delirium in contemporary physics, Bilge
• Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Spaceship Question, xxein
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Spaceship Question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Eric Gisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, AllYou!
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
    • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Len Gaasenbeek
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
    • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, vanep
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, PD
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Spaceship Question, kenseto
      • Re: Spaceship Question, Randy Poe
  • Re: Spaceship Question, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• O'Barr: physical gravity., Gerald L. O'Barr
  • Re: O'Barr: physical gravity., Joe Fischer
  • Re: O'Barr: physical gravity., Hexenmeister
• Time question, Howard
  • Re: Time question, Sue...
  • Re: Time question, Wugi
  • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Time question, kenseto
    • Re: Time question, Howard
      • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Bilge
    • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
  • Re: Time question, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: Time question, dej4
      • Re: Time question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time question, JanPB
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Time question, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: Time question, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Time question, dej4
      • Re: Time question, PD
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
      • Re: Time question, Bilge
  • Re: Time question, Hexenmeister
    • Re: Time question, Howard
      • Re: Time question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Time question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Time question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Time question, Androcles
    • Re: Time question, Bilge
  • Re: Time question, pixel_a_ted
• SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Bilge
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
    • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, dseppala
      • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Russell
  • Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?, Hexenmeister
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Evird
  • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", JanPB
      • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Gr and red shifts, brad
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, sal
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, sal
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Re: Gr and red shifts, Koobee Wublee
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Re: Gr and red shifts, Tom Roberts
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Message not available
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, brad
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Sue...
      • Re: Gr and red shifts, Hexenmeister
• What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, G. L. Bradford
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Aetherist
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bill Hobba
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bill Hobba
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Sue...
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Harry
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
      • Re: Bilge is a "crackpot"., AllYou!
      • Re: AllYou! is a sociopath with no life, Bilge
      • Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Joe Fischer
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Randy Poe
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Randy Poe
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., joeyG007usa
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Bilge
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool., AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, YBM
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Joe Fischer
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: van Moortel defines a "crackpot"!, AllYou!
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, surrealistic-dream
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Aetherist
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, AllYou!
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, lamoore0777
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Hexenmeister
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, PD
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Russell
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Randy Poe
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Androcles
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, jcon
      • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Bilge
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, PD
    • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • Re: What defines a "crackpot"?, Koobee Wublee
• The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real, physicsproblem
  • Re: The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real, Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity (to Ole D.R) et al, lamoore0777
• PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., oriel36
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hexenmeister
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Sue...
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hontas Farmer
    • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4., Hexenmeister
  • Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on: Notice the corrolary.., Hontas Farmer
• calculating x', t', rbwinn3
  • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
    • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', Androcles
      • Re: calculating x', t', Sue...
  • Re: calculating x', t', Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: calculating x', t', shuba
    • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
      • Re: calculating x', t', Bill Hobba
      • Re: calculating x', t', rbwinn3
  • Re: calculating x', t', Hexenmeister
• The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
  • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
    • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Sue...
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Joe Fischer
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Ole D. Rughede
      • Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum, Joe Fischer
      • R