sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• The EINSTEIN-BOHR UNIVERSAL ABSLOUTE
  • From: Jeff
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: Russell
• Re: johnreed take 20
  • From: randamajor
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• TOM SHITHEAD ROBERTS LEARNS SOMETHING.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: johnreed take 20
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Determining direction of motion using relativity.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Russell
• Determining direction of motion using relativity.
  • From: GGB667
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• training tip #6
  • From: tankgirl23@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• The Multidimensional Man
  • From: jnadiaz
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: Harry
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Dimensional Analysis and Relativity
  • From: Retne
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• HUMPTY ROBERTS CHANGES THE MEANING OF WORDS AGAIN.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: avergon
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Massless particles and photons.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: avergon
• Massless particles and photons.
  • From: avergon
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: avergon
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Russell
• Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers)
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: avergon
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: avergon
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Pathology report.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: sal
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Russell
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• O'Barr 30Jan06: The Ether
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: sal
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: dej4
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Retne
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Harry
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: th234
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: big silence in science
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: avergon
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military)
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET? Historical interest
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET? Idiocy.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Quantum Gravity Bad Physics?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Evird
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: th234
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is LET? IDiOCY, of course.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• "Self field theory" SFT - non existant
  • From: Viktor . Sauer
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Why c is not a velocity.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• WILSON DROOL
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: xxein
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET? RADIO WAVES ARE NOT COHERENT - ROBERTS.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET? LIGHT MOVES IN STRAIGHT LINES -- ROBERTS
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: xxein
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: xxein
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is LET? --- BULLSHIT, Just like ROBERTS, SR and GR.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: big silence in science
  • From: dej4
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: dej4
• Re: johnreed take 20
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: xxein
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: we dont do other planets anymore
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: big silence in science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Eistein did not write any theory of gravity
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: big silence in science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 20
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: big silence in science
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• johnreed take 20
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: th234
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: th234
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: oriel36
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• UNIFIED PHYSICS is the name of my physics paper (Peter D Rodgers)
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• The IDIOT Mickey Wilson.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• WAVES IN MERCURY - ROBERTS.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: RP
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: vanep
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: vanep
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Questions²
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: sal
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Questions²
  • From: dej4
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Questions²
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions²
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Questions²
  • From: nuwsguy
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Hexenmeister
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Quantum Spin 1 Is it not Classical Spinning?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group
  • From: h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• ROBERTS IS SORRY (He will be!)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• ROBERTS WON'T ADMIT HIS RELIGIOUS CONVCTIONS
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: vanep
• IGNORANT ROBERTS DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WAVE AND TIDE.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Bilge
• IGNORANT ROBERTS DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WAVE AND TIDE.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: shevek
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: shevek
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• MORON ROBERTS INVENTS "CLOCK RATE"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• DROOLING ROBERTS DROOLS AGAIN.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• O'Barr>Reality!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• ROBERTS of LUCENT IS A FUCKIN' LIAR
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: sal
• Re: Time question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: joeyG007usa
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• What is LET?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: sal
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: test
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet? And what's the deal with Bilge?
  • From: Harry
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: sal
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Russell
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: dej4
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: sal
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lie groups and GR? zuh?
  • From: sal
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: sal
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Bilge, you pathetic, old fool.
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One for Dirk
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: One for Dirk
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: PD
• One for Dirk
  • From: jcon
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Howard
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: AllYou! is a sociopath with no life
  • From: Bilge
• Re: DVM bites again!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bilge is a "crackpot".
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: vanep
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Androcles
• Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time
  • From: Zach
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: lamoore0777
• Tom Roberts, FRAUD.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Russell
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• We All failed (regarding the definition of a crackpot)
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine lightforwa...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forwa...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: total delirium in contemporary physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?
  • From: extremetech2
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Time question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Time question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time question
  • From: Howard
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time question
  • From: dej4
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: dej4
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativity.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: temperature of an atom
  • From: PD
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: PD
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Time question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: van Moortel defines a "crackpot"!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Time question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group
  • From: h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?
  • From: syju100
• Re: Time question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: Russell
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• IF possible, traveling at speed of light then shine light forward, will is shine?
  • From: extremetech2
• Re: Time question
  • From: pixel_a_ted
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time question
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: total delirium in contemporary physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Time question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• The Heim-Theory Research Group
  • From: Tim Murphy
• Burkhard Heim: Take a leap into hyperspace
  • From: Tim Murphy
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time question
  • From: dej4
• Re: O'Barr: physical gravity.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time question
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: total delirium in contemporary physics
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: xxein
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: harry
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Russell
• Re: Time question
  • From: Howard
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: Russell
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Time question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time question
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceship Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: physical gravity.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• O'Barr: physical gravity.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Time question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: jcon
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time question
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Time question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Time question
  • From: Howard
• SR & Jello - please explain this problem/contraction?
  • From: dseppala
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Cult: More Years of Money Making
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: PD
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: YBM
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: St.M
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: JanPB
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on: Notice the corrolary..
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gr and red shifts
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Gr and red shifts
  • From: brad
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• What defines a "crackpot"?
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• The eigenvalues of a Hermitian Operator must be real
  • From: physicsproblem
• Re: Gravity (to Ole D.R) et al
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: oriel36
• PROOF that spacetime must be discrete based on E=1/wavelenth R=2GM and S=A/4.
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: shuba
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Nom
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: calculating x', t'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• calculating x', t'
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Sue...
• The falsity of Einstein's continuum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: harry
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAQ
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: FAQ
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Einstein's Cult: More Years of Money Making
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: FAQ
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• FAQ
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: The Eternal Triangle:- Politics, Science and Religion.
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lifewave Energy Enhancer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: RP
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• a few simple questions (from a layman)
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Do two Spinning spheres Relate to Each Other?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.Same Thing
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Nom
• Re: Harry and the Natural Philosophy Alliance
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Gravity Vs inertia.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: YBM
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Harry and the Natural Philosophy Alliance
  • From: shuba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Heckuva
• Re: what is better for relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• what is better for relativity
  • From: Heckuva
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: Heckuva
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Heckuva
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Heckuva Job
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: For Hanson.
  • From: O'Really
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Nom
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: PD
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• excellent free website on relativity and light
  • From: yoyodog
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Mike
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The H&K Flying Circus
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Heckuva Job
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Mike
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Heckuva Job
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Heckuva Job
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Heckuva Job
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: PD
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: stephen
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: dej4
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Nom
• Re: PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Jerry
• Re: PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Geometric Form
  • From: shevek
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Geometric Form
  • From: St.M
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: glad . gys
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: dej4
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Relative Motion From Absolute Motions
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: PD
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relative Motion From Absolute Motions
  • From: YBM
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: fermions at c, still confussed
  • From: PD
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: PD
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: vern
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• What's the deal with Paul Marmet?
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: PD
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: shevek
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: shevek
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• "Gravity"
  • From: Nom
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: PD
• Rod on Rotating Cylinder Problem
  • From: dseppala
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: PD
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: YBM
• PK Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Ralf
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Any SPACE where a particle is, is NOT empty.!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Distant objects
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: ck19bla
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: dej4
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Distant objects
  • From: glad . gys
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Discussions on SR - QFT
  • From: AndyCav
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: ESKI
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: vern
• Re: Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Solid Grasp of Reality.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: For Hanson.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Shakespeare And Einstein SONNET by Peter D Rodgers -physics & literature
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Help with Twins Paradox variation
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: PD
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Nom
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: vern
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Sue...
• Re: For Hanson.
  • From: Areader
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: abridged
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: abridged
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Harry
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: does light travel forever?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: JanPB
• does light travel forever?
  • From: ck19bla
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• SFT vs QFT and GR
  • From: tfleming1
• String theory questions for a work of fiction
  • From: CJ
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Daniel Weston
• For Hanson.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Sonic boom java applet
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: dej4
• Re: Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: dej4
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: shuba
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Just wondering.....(& waundering)...
  • From: lamoore0777
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Mike
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Nom
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: th234
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Jerry
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: RP
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: RP
• Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics
  • From: RP
• Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: shuba
• Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: dej4
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Jerry
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics
  • From: RP
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Beliefs, and Their Effect on Physics
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Stan Liou
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: PD
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: soup.or.string@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: oriel36
• Problem Constructs, Observer Dependence, and Opinions
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: RP
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: Matthew Isleb
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: another proof that we go back in time
  • From: Brit
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: dej4
• Re: The Un-Photo electric effect
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics also wrong
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Un-Photo electric effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Un-Photo electric effect
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: double precision
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Todd
• The Un-Photo electric effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: double precision
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: double precision
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: vanep
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: double precision
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: double precision
• 2nd law of thermodynamics also wrong
  • From: double precision
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: double precision
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Harvey
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: double precision
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: double precision
• Re: Mass of potential energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Mass of potential energy
  • From: Matthew Isleb
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: clujdej@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: big magician
• Re: the speed of electron
  • From: Randy Poe
• speed of matter
  • From: big magician
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Todd
• the speed of electron
  • From: big magician
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity
  • From: dej4
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: big magician
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: big magician
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: big magician
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: big magician
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: big magician
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: PD
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: dej4
• Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: who brakes the photons from going faster?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Anti-relativist Alliance
  • From: Julian Becker
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: PD
• QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE QUANTIUM LOVE ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455
  • From: switzerland qunatium computer
• QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE QUANTIUM LOVE ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455
  • From: switzerland qunatium computer
• Re: Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Zero evidence for 4-D spacetime Continuum!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: GSS
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: dej4
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: dej4
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Jerry
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Harry
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: stephen
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: The old Sorcerer
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: stephen
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: stephen
• SR view of rotating cylinder collision
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Real Problems nobody talks about
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: vern
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Wugi
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Areader
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: PD
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: jem
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: stephen
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Do the effects of Relativity Effects prevent inter-stellar communications?
  • From: Muddy
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein
  • From: shuba
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• sci.physics.relativity to be Divided.
  • From: Admin
• Inmate assembly notice
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Richard Miller
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: PD
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Can black holes ever form?
  • From: Marko Rauhamaa
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: stephen
• Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A theory
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: ESKI
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Wugi
• Gravitons and black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: into another dimension
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Harry
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: question
  • From: saamaan
• Re: gravitational-wave sources (was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: question
  • From: Ashwin
• Re: A theory
  • From: Ashish
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: gravitational-wave sources (was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Fastest Manmade Meteor
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: xxein
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Matter, Energy and Time
  • From: Ron Poteet
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what a question?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A theory
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: what a question?
  • From: PD
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Encourage a nutcase, reply to him
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Russell
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dishman Proves SR Wrong.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Russell
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: what a question?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• what a question?
  • From: y . s . rajath
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• into another dimension
  • From: change my membership
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: change my membership
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Gravity/Coulomb processor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: rbwinn3
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• To Sue about Inertia. (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Matter, Energy and Time
  • From: sjtjohnson2004
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: xxein
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Matter, Energy and Time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Aether, SR and the big question, SoL
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Yale runs remote controlled flies
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• question
  • From: pvc
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: xxein
• Re: blah blah blah (relativistic version)
  • From: abridged email
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: Julian Becker
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation.
  • From: Julian Becker
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Einsteinhoax
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: blah blah blah (relativistic version)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons
  • From: terms of service
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: xxein
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• tesla's dimensions
  • From: terms of service
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: terms of service
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Ole D. Rughede
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Rapep
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• blah blah blah (relativistic version)
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again
  • From: Mike
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons
  • From: shuba
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again
  • From: Eric Gisse
• thanks bilge sci.physics.relativity gone over to alt.morons
  • From: change my membership
• GR, QM etc wrong, newscientist says, again
  • From: change my membership
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: satish
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: dilation of time
  • From: RP
• Re: dilation of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: dilation of time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• dilation of time
  • From: Jean DAVID
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Bunn&Baez on GR=>Newton
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Russell
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Cause of relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Rapep
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Cause of relativity
  • From: satish
• Re: Triplet's Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: lokiliesmith
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: stephen
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Triplet Paradox
  • From: Russell
• Triplet Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Triplet's Paradox
  • From: phyx
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: xxein
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Mike
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Mike
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes
  • From: ESKI
• Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Philosophy and the prob in and solut to SR's two postulates
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: demeo
• Re: Philosophy and the prob in and solut to SR's two postulates
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: the true George Hammond
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: PD
• Newton's inverse-square force law from Divergent Matter :-)
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: lokiliesmith
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: PD
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: shevek
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: lokiliesmith
• Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: PD
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Sue...
• THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
  • From: lokiliesmith
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Harry
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Ne vous laissez pas raconter n'importe quoi :
  • From: jean . teremetz
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Daniel G. Emilio
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Invalidity of `` SPACE '' theories
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• One hour physics lesson.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: tha major question yaer 2006
  • From: Joe Fischer
• one hundred years of wrong relativity
  • From: my sorry ass
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: my sorry ass
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: my sorry ass
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: my sorry ass
• tha major question yaer 2006
  • From: my sorry ass
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: my sorry ass
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Serif
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: PD
• Re: can u help in this....
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• can u help in this....
  • From: vignesh
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: xxein
• Re: coordinate distance
  • From: xxein
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• coordinate distance
  • From: Harvey
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Serif
• The reasons why SR is an aether theory
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: harry
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• "Gravity"
  • From: Serif
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Fields are Nothing Like Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Magnetic Fields are Nothing Like Gravity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Henri Wilson's program
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Gravitons=>Photons ??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 100 Years
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Jem
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: consider this
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• 100 Years
  • From: gadge
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lienard-Wiechert potential
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer