Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:13:30 -0700
Dear demeo:
<demeo@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136497463.108495.285940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mr. Roberts,
>
> I've said all I care to about your claims and methodology,
> which it seems to me, you are NOT interested to
> uncover the facts and truth,
Facts are uncovered. Truth is what Tom has written.
> but rather aiming to cover up and obfuscate a set of
> findings which you find unpalatable, for a-priori
> reasons.
Miller's experimental setup is flaky. No one has attempted to
repeat the experiment with that type of setup. Miller's "result"
confounds both Loretnz and dragged aether, so is of little
interest to either camp.
> This is apparent in your
> reactions to my posts, and to posts made by others
> which gave important helpful advice. You reject it all,
> and use the "error-bar" argument as a club, to attack
> everything, which strikes me as amateurish and
> hostile,
"Error bars" provided a face on Mars. You argue like you don't
know that science is about repeatability, precision, and
accuracy. It isn't horseshoes and hand grenades.
....
> PS. Get rid of the insulting tone -- accusing
> professionals whom you do not know of "parlor games"
> and so forth, you sound more like a representative of
> the "skeptics clubs" than being a genuine scientist.
I suggest that you read Tom's writings again. Tom has never been
insulting to me, and Heaven knows I've given him reason to be so.
Sometimes it is hard to tell someone they are making uninformed
judgements without realizing what they are assuming.
But then again, Nature simply breaks your leg or takes your life
when you don't heed her warnings. Perhaps everyone else is
wrong, and you are right. Maybe it is OK to be sure there is a
Face on Mars...
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Prev by Date: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Next by Date: Re: Da Vinci's inverse square law by the Dulux method
- Previous by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Next by thread: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|