Re: A theory
Henry Haapalainen:
>Atoms are in fact very small animals. Prove me that I am wrong.
Why? You won't be persuaded by any logic, evidence or common
sense, so ridicule is probably the most entertaining option.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Homologous Myth (There are no gill slits)
... Actually there are a great deal of observational evidence provided. ... he was reporting a fact already known by scientists of the time. ... Because they are derived from a common ancestory. ... Since "evolutionists" understand and accept common ancestory, ...
(talk.origins) - Re: Homologous Myth (There are no gill slits)
... Actually there are a great deal of observational evidence provided. ... he was reporting a fact already known by scientists of the time. ... Because they are derived from a common ancestory. ... Since "evolutionists" understand and accept common ancestory, ...
(talk.origins) - Re: Why is it that every TV special on Stonehenge mentions Druids?
... The evidence is now telling us that the largest ... that's not what a Henge is. ... with regard to the specific point on animals I hope this helps. ... are interpretations and counter interpretations galore. ...
(sci.archaeology) - Re: Stop It!!
... .Let me make this simple for you: Supporting evidence for a hypothesis ... I only care if it's true. ... ..Wisdom et al concluded merely that animals ran away from mountain ... Energy loss is a surrogate for harm, ...
(sci.bio.ecology) - Re: Archaeological remains dated to the First Temple Period discovered on the Temple Mount
... for whom that myth has meaning, and as such, a myth of origin bears witness to the existence and thought of that society. ... The question, as above, was evidence for that society's existence, not whether its myths were historically true. ... Both have in common the inability to find that point in time or its creator. ... So why would this appear in religion? ...
(soc.history.ancient) |
|
