Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:38:22 -0700
Dear phyx:
"phyx" <skearney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136948958.772603.46160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
....
> . One of the few things that would have given me
> greater pleasure than solving this kind of problem
> myself would have been solving it in answer to
> someone's question. You should be very proud
> of your mathematical insight and your talent for
> clear exposition.
Russell pretty much "kicks ***" every time he posts. (And I
don't mean he insults people when I say that.) I always get to
sit back, listen, and learn.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: Russell
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- References:
- Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: Russell
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: Russell
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: Russell
- Re: Triplet Paradox
- From: phyx
- Triplet Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Triplet Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Gravitons and black holes
- Previous by thread: Re: Triplet Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Triplet Paradox
- Index(es):