Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jan 2006 14:36:04 -0800
Abdulah Mahmud Bashkir wrote:
> PD wrote:
> > Staky Mustaky Strikinaky wrote:
> > > i don understan man,
> > >
> > > thay say that a fermion at c requires the energy of
> > > tha whole universe
> >
> > Who's been feeding you these lies?
> >
> > Massive fermions do not exist at c.
>
> fermions are massive
Not necessarily. Neutrinos (up until recently) were completely
compatible with being massless fermions.
>
> is not a matter of existence, but about the required energy in order
> to aproach c
Pick any fraction short of c. The amount of energy required to get it
there is finite. There is a limit on the fraction (look up "Oh-my-God
particles" in Google) practically speaking, but not theoretically.
>
> > Massless fermions at c do not require the energy of the whole universe.
>
> they are called bosons
That's crap.
>
> the question was about fermions
>
> >
> > You are having problems filtering out bad information from good
>
> you have more serious problemes following a point in a
> discussion
>
> > information. Suggest you take a class, where the quality control is a
> > little better.
>
> i will rather suggest that you ask somebody about the energy required
> by a massive particle in order to aproach c
It's finite to approach c. What problem do you have with that?
>
> >
> > PD
> >
> > >
> > > but this cant be true, becus energy only transformes,
> > > therefore ta fermion cant require that energy
> > >
> > > what do you mean with "require", the fermion dont eat
> > >
> > > beside that, what is the consistency of a fermion, EM?
> > >
> > > if yes, then mass is a property of EM !?
> > >
> > > amazing tha science know so litle, but tha technology
> > > do so much with so litle, how do you like it?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Heckuva Job
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- References:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Prev by Date: Re: Illustration of the Second Postulate. See how Utterly Stupid It Is!
- Next by Date: Re: Relative Motion From Absolute Motions
- Previous by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Next by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|