Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:52:20 GMT
Heckuva Job wrote:
PD wrote:Neutrinos (up until recently) were completely compatible with being massless fermions.
so they have mass now?
They always did. It's just that experiments with the ability to observe the tiny mass differences (<1 eV/c^2) are recent.
in many books bosons are massless
Then you need to read better books. The W and Z bosons have masses >80 times that of a proton. There could well be others....
so a mass particle could approach c involving a finite amount of energy?
Yes. In Fermilab's tevatron, the protons travel about 0.9999994 c relative to the ground. That is 800 GeV in kinetic energy, which is extremely tiny on a human scale (think: the energy expended by a flea doing a pushup (:-)).
is it not against relativity?
No, this is fully consistent with SR.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- References:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Heckuva Job
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Prev by Date: Re: Discussions on SR - QFT
- Next by Date: Re: Solid Grasp of Reality.
- Previous by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Next by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|