Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:35:39 -0600
Eric Gisse wrote:
Tom Roberts wrote:experiments with the ability to observe the tiny mass differences (<1 eV/c^2) are recent.
Did someone finally put a lower bound on their masses that is larger than zero?
Neutrino flavor oscillations have been observed in numerous experiments. Combined with Lorentz invariance that implies that the different flavors have different masses, and they can put lower bounds on the squares of the mass differences. All three neutrino flavors (electron, muon, tau) are observed to oscillate among themselves. We don't yet know the actual masses of any flavors of neutrino, but at most one flavor could have zero mass. There is a rich literature on "neutrino oscillations" that has the details.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- References:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Heckuva Job
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Prev by Date: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
- Next by Date: Re: Geometric Form
- Previous by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Next by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|