Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 19:34:16 -0800
Bilge wrote:
> Bilge:
> > Eric Gisse:
> > >
> > >
> > >I see an interesting possibility though. What if one of the neutrino
> > >masses were zero?
> >
> > They cannot be zero. It's easiest to see this using just two neutrinos,
> >but the same holds for three. It's just more complex.
>
> Correction: I misread your statement. One neutrino mass could be zero.
> What the neutrino masses cannot be is degenerate.
Which, if I read your response right, would be if two of the masses
were equal or both zero. But I still don't see the problem with one of
them being zero.
Then again, a lot of your explanation DID go over my head, so I
probably missed a valuable point or three. I honestly don't know much
of anything about QFT [This is QFT, right? :P]. The book I got on it
happens to be only useful as a paper weight as of now, until I learn
more about Lie algebras/groups.
.
- References:
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: PD
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Heckuva Job
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Bilge
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- From: Bilge
- Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Prev by Date: Re: calculating x', t'
- Next by Date: Re: What defines a "crackpot"?
- Previous by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Next by thread: Re: fermions at c, still confussed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|