Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.

In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson)
<HW@>
wrote
on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:38:37 GMT
<vhgqt1hoj0dfdn2as63ppjldothep3m9qj@xxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:00:43 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
> <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson)
>><HW@>
>> wrote
>>on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:10:58 GMT
>><vajot15e81r2r36vo305nd8fdj7tg0mhh6@xxxxxxx>:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:00:19 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
>>> <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson)
>>>><HW@>
>>>> wrote
>>>>on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:48:54 GMT
>>>><3v3ot1ple8nn8mdb1mg948lju9t3tjr340@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A____________L______________B
>>>>>
>>>>> A and B are two observers equipped with light sources and clocks,
>>>>> at each end of a long rigid rod of length L. Because the clocks
>>>>> are at mutually at rest, the clock rates can be absolutely synched.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[OWLS/TWLS snipped for brevity]
>>>>
>>>>> Poor old Einy didn't know what he actually achieved!!!!
>>>>
>>>>No one is disputing lightspeed relative to its source. The
>>>>question is: if B is moving, what does he measure the
>>>>lightspeed from A to be?
>>>
>>> Ghost, sometimes I am very concerned about your ability to
>>> comprehend what you read. Are you trying to catch Androcles
>>> in the dementia competition?
>>>
>>> Didn't you see the part about A and B being connected by a rigid rod?
>>
>>I did. That's a bit pointless, actually (nobody's
>>disagreeing there); I'm more interested in the measurement
>>of light's velocity when B is moving.
>>
>>So I detached it. Is this a problem?
>
>
> Just a small one Ghost.
> It becomes a different subject altogether.
>
> The principle, TWLS=OWLS=c, only applies in a single frame .....
> so why the hell do you want to introduce other frames.

Well, for starters, SR also postulates TLWS=OWLS=c for a stationary
light source. For a moving light source SR postulates c;
AFAICT your theory postulates c'=c+kv where k is a variable
factor depending on length of traversal and whatever's
between the light and the measurement point.

>
>
> HW.
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
>


--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is c really constant in a strong grav field?
    ... >> The Ghost In The Machine wrote: ... >>> ground and AB is pointing straight up at a light source. ... > anything but c *in the curved spacetime that is the Earth's Surface?* ... "If you want to use standard rulers and standard clocks synchronized ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is BaT, exactly?
    ... The Ghost In The Machine: ... I want to know the postulates ... the Ballistic Light Theory (BaT for short). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)