Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.

Hexenmeister wrote:
> "JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1138582423.455005.238750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Henri Wilson wrote:
> >> On 28 Jan 2006 22:27:58 -0800, "JanPB" <filmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Now imagine A and B and the rod accelerate a bit (fire rocket engines
> >> >for a minute). After the acceleration is turned off again, will their
> >> >clocks be still in sync (according to the procedure above)?
> >>
> >> They should be, but if they were physically affected by the acceleration
> >> they
> >> can easily be resynched with the above method.
> >
> > Well, it's not an absolute sync then.
> >
> > --
> > Jan Bielawski
>
> Yep.

Nop.

> [300,000 + (-300,000)]/2 = 300,000/1 -- Wilson and Einstein.

He said "They should be, but if they were physically affected by the
acceleration they can easily be resynched" - which means they could go
out of sync.

--
Jan Bielawski

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absolute Time
    ... The time rate of change of acceleration. ... Evens the biggest Jerk around here is Evens. ... >>Henri Wilson. ... >>See proof that light speed is source dependent. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Single Experiment that Destroys Einstein.
    ... Henri Wilson wrote: ... should be damaged by the acceleration during launch in exactly the same way, ... for the GPS, GLANOSS, Vessot experiment, Alley experiment and several others. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why TWLS= 0 <> OWLS in any ONE Frame.
    ... >>>Now imagine A and B and the rod accelerate a bit (fire rocket engines ... After the acceleration is turned off again, ... it's not an absolute sync then. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
    ... >>Now imagine A and B and the rod accelerate a bit (fire rocket engines ... After the acceleration is turned off again, ... it's not an absolute sync then. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)