Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.


Hexenmeister wrote:
> "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1138616963.124698.245630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Henri Wilson wrote:
> > On 29 Jan 2006 22:04:43 -0800, "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Henri Wilson wrote:
> > >> A____________L______________B
> > >>
> > >> A and B are two observers equipped with light sources and clocks, at
> > >> each end
> > >> of a long rigid rod of length L. Because the clocks are at mutually at
> > >> rest,
> > >> the clock rates can be absolutely synched.
> > >>
> > >> When A's clock reads 0.000000000000, A sends a light pulse towards B.
> > >> Its speed
> > >> is 'c' relative to A, and therefore also 'c' relative to B. Its travel
> > >> time is
> > >> L/c (but at this stage we don't know the value of c).
> > >>
> > >> When the pulse arrives, B instantly adjusts his own clock to
> > >> 0.0000000000000
> > >> and immediately sends a return pulse towards A. It travels at 'c' wrt B
> > >> and
> > >> therefore also 'c' wrt A. Its travel time is also L/c (but at this
> > >> stage we
> > >> still don't know the value of c).
> > >>
> > >> This is sufficient to demonstrate that tAB=tBA. They are both
> > >> numerically equal
> > >> to L/c. Only an aethrist would disagree.
> > >>
> > >> Next, A reads his clock when B's pulse arrives. It reads
> > >> x.yxyeycjfmflfldfdgdkg.
> > >>
> > >> This reading, 't', is light's total travel time from A to B and back
> > >> again to
> > >> A. From this A calculates c as being 2L/t.
> > >>
> > >> Note: A can replace B with a mirror and do the same thing, knowing that
> > >> the
> > >> travel times in each direction must be the same.
> > >>
> > >> To synch the clocks A and B according to Einstein, B simply adjusts his
> > >> current
> > >> clock reading upwards by (x.yxyeycjfmflfldfdgdkg)/2.
> > >>
> > >> Now, if A sends a pulse to B at time To, B receives it at (To+L/c), at
> > >> which
> > >> instant A's clock must also read exactly (To+L/c).
> > >>
> > >> If B sends a pulse towards A at time T1, A receives it at (T1+L/c), at
> > >> which
> > >> instant B's clock must also read exactly (T1+L/c)
> > >>
> > >> The clocks are now 'absolutely' synched.
> > >>
> > >> Poor old Einy didn't know what he actually achieved!!!!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> HW.
> > >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
> > >
> > >Improved Kennedy-Thorndike experiment to test
> > >special relativity
> > >Dieter Hils and J. L. Hall
> > >
> > >Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics,
> > >National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of
> > >Colorado,
> > >Boulder, Colorado 80309-0440
> > >
> > >Received 6 November 1989
> > >We have carried out a modern version of the Kennedy-Thorndike
> > >experiment by searching for sidereal variations between the frequency
> > >of a laser locked to an l2 reference line and a laser locked to the
> > >resonance frequency of a highly stable cavity. No variations were
> > >found at the level of 2×10-13. This represents a 300-fold improvement
> > >over the original Kennedy-Thorndike experiment and allows the Lorentz
> > >transformations to be deduced entirely from experiment at an accuracy
> > >level of 70 ppm.
> >
> > There ain't no such thing as a lorentz contraction.
> >
> << If you give a rod a push, how would it know whether to become longer
> or
> shorter? >>
> A ruler that elastically changes length or optically changes
> length is a misreprestntation of the transform's purpose,
> It is a physical impossibility, and a mathematical absurdity.
>
> The false gedankens are continally argued because it is the
> only way to get the two dollars into the bell hops pocket.
> (Space-time continuum, twins etc )
>
> The correct interpretation is as testable as Doppler radar
> or a television antenna and as mathematically proveable
> as Pythatgoras theorem.
> (It *IS* Pythagoras theorem as a matter of fact. )
>
> How goes the study of REAL physics and opposed to
> meta-physics?
> http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/teal_tour.htm
>
> It goes likes this.
> http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wilson/Wilson.htm

Wilson needs to learn the difference in space-time and a
space-time continuum.

Scanning right to left note the discontinuity emerging
at about lamba = 2 .
http://www.conformity.com/0102reflectionsfig3.gif

Sue...

> Androcles.
>
>
>
> Sue...
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >©1990 The American Physical Society
> > >
> > >URL: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v64/p1697
> > >DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1697
> > >PACS: 03.30.+p, 07.60.Ly, 42.50.Wm, 42.60.-v
> > >http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v64/i15/p1697_1
> > >----------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/reference/wave_impedance
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy-Thorndike_experiment
> > >http://www.conformity.com/0102reflections.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Sue...
> >
> >
> > HW.
> > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

.