Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: "Androcles" <androc1es@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Feb 2006 06:04:34 -0800
Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Henri Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:24:18 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen" > > <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>Henri Wilson wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:05:32 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen" > >>><paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Henri Wilson wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Androcles is correct for once. > >>>>>Sagnac is NOT understood. > >>>>> > >>>>>The classical explanation - which is also SR's - is the same as that which > >>>>>would apply to a sound based sagnac interferometer in still air. > >>>> > >>>>Right. > >>>>The speed of light is isotropic c in an inertial frame. > >>>>The speed of sound is isotropic c in the air frame. > >>>> > >>>>So you do understand the Sagnac experiment. > >>>>Then you also understand why the emission theory > >>>>predicts no Sagnac effect. > >>> > >>> > >>>Paul, you are behind the times. > >> > >>Does that mean that you no longer understand > >>the Sagnac experiment? > >>The laws of nature have yet again changed? > > > > > > I understand it better than anyojne. I have discovered the real reason for the > > fringe shift. > > > > It fully supports the BaTh. > > Quite. > The REAL reason is of course that interferometers > are governed by previously unknown laws of nature > newly discovered by Henry Wilson. > > As this great genius has taught us, the laws of > nature are different for different phenomena. > > Paul Yep. Henry Wilson has discovered the power of Shiraz to change the laws of Nature. It certainly changed his programming capabilities from zero to -1. http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wilson/Wilson.htm http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/WilsonFix.JPG http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/STM/Scoundrels.htm Androcles. .
- References:
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Prev by Date: Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
- Next by Date: Re: A small conservation of energy puzzle
- Previous by thread: Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Next by thread: Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading