Re: Spaceship Question
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:50:07 GMT
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138910615.886810.143630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Henri Wilson wrote:
On 1 Feb 2006 18:20:36 -0800, "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
with
Henri Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:32:42 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If I am to measure the length of a _moving_ rod,
I can obviously not run after it with my tape.
Then get in your car and chase it.
When level, check its length with your tape.
If you change reference frames so that the rod is now at rest
in your rest frame, we do not call that a "moving rod".
That's very observant of you.
Do you think its length is affected by the fact that you have caught up
it?
Yes. Length is frame-dependent
NO.....light path of length of a rod is frame-dependent.
.
- References:
- Re: Spaceship Question
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Spaceship Question
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Spaceship Question
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Spaceship Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Spaceship Question
- Next by Date: Re: Spaceship Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Spaceship Question
- Next by thread: Re: Spaceship Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|