Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer

Henri Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:09:42 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Henri, you are evading the point.

You wrote:
"It should be obvious that 'gamma' in relation to one object
will increase and the other decrease."

So what you find contradictory is that gamma
_in relation to one object_ (observer) is different

from gamma _in relation to_ another object (observer).

So what conclusion would any normal person reach, Henri?

The only possible conclusion is the obvious one.
The two gammas are different because the two
relations to the objects (observers) are different.
Gamma is a property of the _relation_.

Why is this so hard to grasp, Henri?


It isn't at all hard to grasp...unless one is an SRian.
It simply proves that nothing happens to the object....which is what I have
been trying to tell you.

You have still not got it, Henri.
The point is that YOU claim that according to SR,
something have to happen to the object.

Why have you "been trying to tell me" the obvious
which never was disputed?
Because you believe SR say otherwise.
Why else would you insinuate that "SRians" don't understand it?

You have been told literally hundreds of times
during years, and still haven't got it.

And what I have told you hundreds of times during years
is that according to SR, nothing happens to the object.

I've got it all right. You people are bloody hypocrites.

See?
You still haven't got it.

What conclusion must a normal person draw from that, Henri?


SR is BULL!!!!!

See?
You haven't got it.
SR is "bull" because it claims that something happens to
the object, right? :-)
But it don't.

You will never get it, Henri.
I think you quite simply is to dumb.

Paul
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... Henri, ... "It should be obvious that 'gamma' in relation to one object ... _in relation to one object_ (observer) is different ... so that changing the length does not imply changing the object. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... > Henri Wilson wrote: ... >>>Henri Wilson wrote: ... >>>>>The observer's observations are observer dependent. ... >>>So what is 'gamma' Henri? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... Don't you read the messages of your colleagues PD and AllYou. ... This statement reveals that YOU think 'gamma' is a property ... | is frame dependent, Henry insists that the someone has said ... changes, depending on the observer. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... | Gamma is a property of the _relation_. ... | is frame dependent, Henry insists that the someone has said ... moving train by simply hopping on board and pulling out your tape. ... the object and observer, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... Don't you read the messages of your colleagues PD and AllYou. ... This statement reveals that YOU think 'gamma' is a property ... | is frame dependent, Henry insists that the someone has said ... 'gamma' in relation to one reference object (or observer) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)