Re: The H&K Flying Circus

Henri Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:20:06 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Henri Wilson wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:50:37 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Henri Wilson wrote:


On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:24:18 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Henri Wilson wrote:



On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:05:32 +0100, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Henri Wilson wrote:




Androcles is correct for once.
Sagnac is NOT understood.

The classical explanation - which is also SR's - is the same as that which
would apply to a sound based sagnac interferometer in still air.

Right.
The speed of light is isotropic c in an inertial frame.
The speed of sound is isotropic c in the air frame.

So you do understand the Sagnac experiment.
Then you also understand why the emission theory
predicts no Sagnac effect.


Paul, you are behind the times.

Does that mean that you no longer understand
the Sagnac experiment?
The laws of nature have yet again changed?


I understand it better than anyojne. I have discovered the real reason for the
fringe shift.

It fully supports the BaTh.

Quite.
The REAL reason is of course that interferometers
are governed by previously unknown laws of nature
newly discovered by Henry Wilson.

As this great genius has taught us, the laws of
nature are different for different phenomena.


Unlike Einstein worshippers, I still believe there are scientific questions to
be answered.

Like how an interferometer works?


I have discovered the real reason for the sagnac fringe shift.
It fully supports the BaTh.

Of course you have. Of course it does.
Interferometers are governed by hitherto unknown laws of nature,
newly discovered by you.
Since you assert the BaT CANNOT be wrong (how could it be?),
nature MUST obey and change it's laws accordingly.


We know that the SR explanation is identical to that which would apply to a
'sound sagnac' in still air. In other words SR relies on aether theory to
explain sagnac.

Quite.
The speed of light is c in the ether frame.
The speed of light is c in all inertial frames.
The latter relies on the former.
Another world shattering Wilsonian discovery.

Paul
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus
    ... Sagnac is NOT understood. ... The laws of nature have yet again changed? ... Another world shattering Wilsonian discovery. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus
    ... Sagnac is NOT understood. ... would apply to a sound based sagnac interferometer in still air. ... The laws of nature have yet again changed? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus
    ... Henri Wilson wrote: ... Sagnac is NOT understood. ... The laws of nature have yet again changed? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sagnac laser speedometer
    ... Does the Sagnac explanation work for both cases? ... any interest to others and if you disagree with the laws of mechanics, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The H&K Flying Circus
    ... Henri Wilson wrote: ... I have discovered the real reason for the sagnac fringe shift. ... Interferometers are governed by hitherto unknown laws of nature, ... The speed of light is c in all inertial frames. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)