Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Feb 2006 16:22:34 -0800
Henri Wilson wrote:
[snip]
It wouldn't matter if there was and it did.
The LET analysis of how an object moving in the aether will appear in the frame
of an observer also moving in the aether but at a diferent absolute speed is
exactly what SR says.
You just admitted AGAIN to not understanding SR and here you are
talking about SR. I find that interesting.
The two statements below are not identical, Henri.
The speed of light is c in the ether frame.
The speed of light is c in all inertial frames.
But you don't see the difference, do you? :-)
The difference is that SR has no physical significance at all. It merely
reverts to LET in any practical situation.
More of you talking about what you do not understand.
Paul
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
.
- References:
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Prev by Date: Re: Acceleration of charge
- Next by Date: Re: time?
- Previous by thread: Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Next by thread: Re: The H&K Flying Circus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|