Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer

Hexenmeister wrote:
"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dskosp$d3f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hexenmeister wrote:

"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dsia72$f6o$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Hexenmeister wrote:


You? Normal? Narwhal, maybe, but about a normal as a K2 accretion disk
bouncing of the surface of a B8.

"about a normal as"?
"bouncing of the surface"?

Paul


I spelt i in Norwhagian s that you'd undrstad.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/STM/Scoundrels.htm#Tusselad
Androcles.

So we can conclude that we are equally bad in English.


Do we, tusselad? It would appear that you have included some other
person besides yourself in that statement. That other person cannot be
me since I can reach my own conclusion[] and mine differ[s] from yours.

If this conclusion of yours is as correct as your conclusions usually are,
my words are confirmed.

Or should that be "my own conclusion[s] and mine differ[] from yours"?
Where those 's's go is subtle, Tusselad, a non-English speaker give[s]
himself away. It make[] him look as intelligent as he is.
Who is or are the other person or people with whom you concur?


My Norwegian is very good, though.


I'm quite amicable to that issue, tusselad. My English is also very good.
We are not equally bad in English, although we may be equally bad in
Narwhal.
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others" -- George Orwell

I do confess that the only word I know in Narwhal is "tusselad" (plural
"tusselader"). It reminds me of "tusk", which a narwhal has.

http://www.shsonline.org/WhaleResearch/Narwhal.gif

I do believe these hapless creatures are hunted by Esquimeaux.

Right. By American Inuits.

Kristiansund is further North than Kristiansand, I gather, being 240 miles
from the Arctic circle. The Arctic circle crosses your country, Tusselad.
Do you live far enough North to qualify as an Esquimeaux, Tusselad?

"an Esquimeaux"?


Which language do you master, Androcles?


C++, Macro Assembler, Pascal, Basic. I'm fluent in American and English,
I have a little Deutsche and a little Cymraeg. Do you master Cymraeg,
Tusselad?

Are these examples of fluent Cymraeg, maybe?
"about a normal as"
"bouncing of the surface"
"an Esquimeaux"

Sorry, Androcles.
I thought it was bad English, not fluent Cymraeg.

BTW, Androcles.
"Macro Assembler" isn't a programming language.
The correct phrase is "assembly language".
It may be fluent Cymraeg, but it is bad English, Androcles!


If so you could teach me, my niece's child speaks it better than I.
I doubt you could teach me the difference between impedance
and resistance, though, even if they do share the same units,

You are probably right.
You are too old, drunk and senile to learn anything
from anyone.

Just see what happened when I tried to teach you some
elementary issues of electrical engineering:

Paul B. Andersen wrote in May 2004:
| That the electric and magnetic fields in an EM-wave
| are in phase is basic knowledge.
| See my response to Henry for an explanation of
| why Maxwell's equations say so.
|
| What you say about energy conservation is plain nonsense.
| That the energy density in a point changes with time and
| periodically is zero doesn't mean that energy isn't conserved.
|
| To illustrate this point, I will give a simple analogy.
| Consider a transmission line terminated with its
| characteristic impedance R.
| A sinusoidal wave is propagating on the line.
| I will assume you know that the voltage and current
| are in phase in such a wave.

Androcles responded:
| No, I don't know that. If that is what you think, you are nuts.
| (Well, we know you are anyway.) You certainly make a lot
| of false assumptions.

Andersen continues:
| (That's why nothing is reflected
| when the boundary condition is that it is terminated
| with R, where the voltage is in phase with the current,
| u(t) = R*i(t) )
| The voltage can be written:
| u(x,t) = Usin(wt - kx)
| where U is a constant voltage,
| w is the angular frequency
| k is the wave number k = w/c
| The current can be written:
| i(x,t) = (U/R)sin(wt - kx)
| The power p(x,t) is thus:
| p(x,t) = ui = (U2/R)(sin(wt - kx))2
| At an arbitrary point like x = 0, we have
| p(t) = (U2/R)(sin(wt ))2

Androcles responded:
| Here we go, another stupid dtau/dt = 0 < 1 argument.
| Shove it, Andersen.

Andersen continues:
| The power passing through the point varies with
| time like sinus squared. It is always positive,
| which in this context means that it is flowing in
| the positive x-direction.
| Energy is conserved. It all ends up as heat in R.
| But the flow varies with time.
|
| Does the fact that incandescent lamps flicker
| mean that energy isn't conserved?

Androcles responded:
| Gawd... this poor guy doesn't have a clue that
| a resistance is not the same as an impedance,

Paul B. Andersen wrote:
| The characteristic impedance of a normal transmission
| line is resistive.

Androcles responded:
| Sure. That's why it is made of pure copper.

Andersen continues:
| That means that the voltage and current
| of a travelling wave are in phase.

Androcles responded:
| Sure. Spout all the nonsense you like. Be a clown.

Andersen continues:
| When such a transmission line
| is terminated with its characteristic impedance - which
| is resistive and thus is a RESISTANCE, the standing
| wave ratio is zero, nothing is reflected, and the voltage
| and current in the transmission line are in phase everywhere.
|
| If you don't know this, you are very ignorant.
| Which you obviously are.

Androcles responded:
| Sure. A pure copper conductor is a 50 ohm resistance. Got it.
| Got any more jokes? This one is kind of silly.

What is most hilarious is that you still don't understand
what a giant fool you made of yourself, Androcles. :-)

"Androcles, the electrical engineer". :-)

> or even the difference between a K2 star and a K2 accretion disk.

"a K2 accretion disk", another example of fluent Cymraeg?

That's the main reason why I will not be recommending your little
college to anybody anytime soon, no matter how desperate you are
for low budget fee-paying students from other countries and attempt
to misteach athletics in American. :-)

Androcles.

Quite.
With your demonstrated expertise in electrical engineering,
I am sure your recommendations are much appreciated.

It isn't possible to have an intelligent conversation with you,
but you sure are fun to tease, Androcles.

Paul
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Androcles logic (was Bilges logic)
    ... Only Paul Andersen is so stupid as to ... A - rather arbitrary - example of Androcles closing the trap. ... | | What is the voltage across A-C? ... | "Assume no resistance in the circuit". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GPS GR Correction Myth.
    ... > Androcles wrote: ... > the waves must must be in phase in the points C and B. ... How right you are, tusselad. ... The wavelength hasn't changed though. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... Where those 's's go is subtle, Tusselad, a non-English speaker give ... Did you think that means that the surface is bouncing, Androcles? ... "Macro Assembler" isn't a programming language. ... Do the Narwhalese often sneeze in other people's faces, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... I'd not dispute that nonsense should be grammatically and syntactically correct, Tusselad. ... So the K2 IS torn apart and there is an accretion disk around the B8 akin to the rings of Saturn. ... Did you think that means that the surface is bouncing, Androcles? ... "Macro Assembler" isn't a programming language. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Question They Cannot Answer
    ... correct, Tusselad. ... and there is an accretion disk around the B8 akin to the rings of Saturn. ... Did you think that means that the surface is bouncing, Androcles? ... "Macro Assembler" isn't a programming language. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)