Re: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- From: "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:35:27 GMT
<guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139948545.212149.324790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
a) The 0 to 300,000 year after the Bang for energy to form into
gluons/electrons/plasma "seems" abnormally small?
Your comprehension is appalling. That is not what the link I gave said.
Consider kindergarten finger-painting.
Bill
For the sake of simplicity we'll call the Big Bang's energy: "RAYS"
1. According to rules for Time Paradox and Relativity, time had no
meaning for the "RAYS" wrt to each other (same speed but angled away
from each other like rays of star light which is similar to say two
twins moving the same speed but at different directions(angles) wrt to
each other) but these "RAYS" had meaning wrt to their origin (the
singularity)?
2. We still have in common the singularity as the yard stick (distance)
to measure the travel time of these RAYS since we are still propulsing
wrt to the singularity and therefore 300,000 years seems abnormally too
small?
Meaning the twins (RAYS) come back younger in age (even though they
travelled at different directions/angles) but according to our time
clock it took the twins (and RAYS) forever to go and come back?
------------------------------------------------------------
*****Even more important****
We couldn't still be moving at the speed of light wrt to the
singularity...correct ....and since this energy substantially slowed
down in only 300,000 when it had near zero mass therefore shouldn't the
present massive bodies in space have already completely slowed down
and/or have come to a reversed big crunch???
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- References:
- Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why TWLS=OWLS=c in any ONE Frame.
- Next by Date: Re: Questions about radiation and em waves
- Previous by thread: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- Next by thread: Re: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|