Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:11:13 GMT
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140304657.450755.62950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Get a pair of laser pointers and try it.
Fair enough.
In the case of two separate slide projectors projecting the same image on
the screen at the same location, the light source that illuminates each
slide is NOT the same. Consequently, interference between the two
projected
images will not result even though the projected image is the same.
(In addition it is difficult to make two identical copies of a slide.)
They will be twice as bright because it is random light.
Err... Holography. Check your driver's license or credit card.
Laser light is not "random".
In the case of the multiple telescopes, the same star is used as a light
source which means that an interference pattern may result, although not
to
the same extend as would have occurred if we had used the star in a two
slit
experiment. This is the case because it is much harder to make two
telescopes which are exactly alike than two slits.
Click on the VLTI delay line to see just how hard it is.
Flying machines are hard too, but I don't discount that
such devices might exist just because the problem is difficult.
I hope this answers your question since I am still not quite sure what
was
bothering you about my previous postings.
You have the photon clocks of Feynman's path integral but
you seem to be lacking the abilty to explore all paths.
Asking about the VLTI is just a convenient way to inquire
about your theory because a real device leaves no ambiguity.
Without ability to explore all paths, your theory predicts that
VLTI does not work in interferometer mode...
but it does work so you need to go break their telescope. ;o)
Hmmm...
I'll make a gif of that.
Androcles.
Sue...
Good luck, Len.
................................................
.
- References:
- The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Sue...
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- From: Sue...
- The Constant Speed of Light.
- Prev by Date: Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
- Next by Date: Re: Einstein swinging from a rope
- Previous by thread: Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- Next by thread: Re: The Constant Speed of Light.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|