Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: "SCW" <doune60@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 04:38:53 -0800
Hexenmeister wrote:
"SCW" <doune60@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141030364.030928.247320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mathematicians call that "circularity", deriving what is assumed
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Chris:
"Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:VypMf.62771$DM.60988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There is no why, it is an experimental result. That
is that.
Actually, c is a constant *by definition*. The meter is defined
by c and time...
David A. Smith
Nice dodge ;) That doesn't explain why it was constant before the
definition was changed to the current one.
Bruce richmond
Fact is, c seems to be constant for the same reason that Plank's
constant is constant (!)
It just fits - more engineering than science.
SCW
in the first instance.
It is because it say it is, therefore it is.
Such argument is pointless.
Androcles.
Agreed.
SCW
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- References:
- Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: bornto@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: Chris
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: SCW
- Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- From: Hexenmeister
- Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- Prev by Date: Re: Acceleration of charge
- Next by Date: Re: LIGHT SPEED = ISOTROPIC and BEYOND ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|