Re: The Fundamental Absurdity of the Theory of Relativity


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.02.27.05.57.06.782081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:07:15 -0500, Spaceman wrote:


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.02.27.00.04.55.650466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[quoted text muted]

First step would be to find the actual physical cause of course.

And you have *no idea* what this might be??

Actually I do.
but that will be saved for the big show coming up.
:)


Unless you want to keep repeating the history of clock malfunctions.
and some on board clock of the starship will be incorrectly
counting time and will end up causing the ship to crash into an
asteroid that should not have been there yet according to that
malfunctioning clock.
[quoted text muted]

I suppose next you'll want to replace the clock on board a muon, stored in
a storage ring going at high speed. That's malfunctioning, too.

No,
I can show how an object in motion lives longer simple
because it has more energy while in motion.
(the same is basically true of ths clock problem)
or course you won't find it because you have already
accepted a stupid "time dilation" that is actually a breaking
of the science of measurements standards.


As for ships crashing into asteroids -- NEAR did reasonably well, even
with its malfunctioning clock.

It's clock was our clock here on Earth.
I guess you never knew that huh?


Regrettably, there was a Japanese effort
that didn't quite achieve its objective, but it didn't crash into the
asteroid -- though I'm not sure the probe worked. (Its intent: to grab
some of the stuff of the asteroid and transport it back.)

Yup, they allowed the probes clock to be a real factor,
and did not account for actual timing or they were just going to
fast to slow it down to begin with.


.

Relevant Pages