Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 07:57:15 -0800
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Sue... wrote:You are interchanging the terms age and time without
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Sue... wrote:
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Sue... wrote:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Sue...
<suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 14 Feb 2006 13:59:46 -0800
<1139954386.644820.114080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Sue... wrote:
Sui and Lui watch the same shows on cable television and
count the same total orbits of Jupiter's moons.
That is a bigger hint.
So you say over and over, but you cannot explain why.
Why does the obvious fact that the two twins will count
the same number of orbits of the Jovian moons prove that
they age equally much?
What is your physical definition of 'age' ?
Can you give an example of some mechanism
that illustrates the definition?
Sue...
How about a worn wristwatch? Will that do?
NO
I take this to mean that you claim that your
wrist watch does not show your age.
My heart doesn't stop beating when I remove
the watche's battery so I suspect some sort
of disconnect.
A stupididty!
I knew it!
(Please don't say that you forgot to change
the battery or a similar stupidity.)
The test for a causal connecting is valid and logical.
I can't help it if you find logic stupid.
Which test for which causal connection are you
talking about?
Don't know, eh?
You are babbling.
Are you serious?
Do you think your biological clock runs at
a rate different from your wrist watch?
If you wrist watch say you have aged one year,
how do you then find how much you _really_ have aged?
How do you know your age?
It doesn't matter how I know my age because I
will lie about it anyway. :o)
Another "funny" stupidity.
Why can't you give a straight answer?
Do you, or do you not think that your wrist watch
shows your age?
I know your answer now.
Watches don't show your age.
Marbles do.
But as I predicted, you didn't answer my question:
I never have to. You usually answer for me.
Why does the obvious fact that the two twins will count
the same number of orbits of the Jovian moons prove that
they age equally much?
You haven't offered any bioscience crededentials
or experiments to support that kind of derivation.
I am asking _you_ to support _your_ claim.
It is not my claim that the number of marbles in
a garden hose can magically change. I claim the
the same number of marbles that goes into one
end of a garden hose will exit the other end.
If you have a bag of marbles and a garden hose
that behaves otherwise... DO post some pictures
and details.
Sue...
So we can conclude that you are unable to
give any reason whatsoever for why the obvious fact
that the two twins will count he same number of orbits
of the Jovian moons (or marbles, if you prefer) prove that
they age equally much.
any mathematical rigour that would relate to a
biological growth process. If you want to support
electrodynamic theory with biological phenomena,
you are the one who has the responsibily to show
some reasonable conneciton.
Perhaps telomers, skin wrinkles and hair growth are discussed
here:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
Sue...
Why does the obvious fact that the two twins will count
the same number of orbits of the Jovian moons prove that
they age equally much?
You won't answer, of course.
You never do.
I never have to.
You obviously can't.
All you ever do is to give idiotic remarks
probably supposed to be funny.
I suppose that must be because you know you are unable
to support your claims, so you don't even try.
Thanks for confirming my words.
Why do you then think your claims are true?
Blind faith?
Or don't you think your claims are true?
Now, when your mission is accomplished,
I have realized the stupidity in my attempts
to get a sensible answer from you.
I may repeat my stupidity, though.
It's kind of fun to watch your evasive manoeuvres. :-)
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- References:
- 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: jubair . pk
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: PD
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Sue...
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Sue...
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Sue...
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Sue...
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Sue...
- Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- 'paradox' of twin paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- Next by Date: Re: LIGHT SPEED = ISOTROPIC and BEYOND ??
- Previous by thread: Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- Next by thread: Re: 'paradox' of twin paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|