Re: O'Barr: A photon has real mass!

In <46ie9gFbdtggU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
FrediFizzx <fredifi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
. . .

<deletes by O'Barr>


O'Barr wrote:
Do a simple google group search, using "at theory" and
globarr. This might bring up one or two articles.
Note that q-basic programs have been written and posted
several times.

FrediFizzx <fredifi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sheesh, I don't have time for all that. Post some math
here right now if you wish.

O'Barr comments:
Well, at least you are more honest than most, you really
have no interest at all. But just in case, let me say a
little about this theory. Anyone can do the math, since it
is simple Newtonian math. It is very much like the math in
PV = nRT. However, it is more complicated than the kinetic
theory of gases because in the at theory, exchanges of mass
occur, as spalls, in every collision. Therefore, in the at
theory, we have one new variable to include in the
relationship, these changes in mass, these exchanges in
mass, on top of all the other variables that are included
in PV = nRT. And this new variable is found to be a non-
linear variable. And this new variable is found to be
sufficient to provide to us the appearance of space
reaching forces. It is sufficient to provide to us QM
effects. It is sufficient to provide to us everything that
seemed to have been missing. It even allows us to have an
ether, a real physical ether, which is a 'sea' of mass and
energy, yet appears to not be there as far as any first
order drag or resistance to motion is concerned.

Now these changes in mass in these collisions have
to follow conservation laws. That is, for any
particle that is a stable particle, then the exchanges of
mass over any cycle or long term time period must return to
some fixed amount. Thus, no single interaction can be used
as any result of the theory. One has to use a set of
interactions where the ending masses are reestablished for
all the particles involved. Thus, the math is complicated
in that many series of interactions have to be followed,
and only net results are of interest. I find, therefore,
that computer results are the most reliable, where all
interactions are set up, and followed, and once you have
what is seen to be stable, then you make your measurements
to see what over-all effects are occurring. For these
reasons, I have very little math as to specific results.
Sorry about that. The math exists, but only as
approximations. The computer can handle hundreds of
interactions, and be much more exact in saying what is
going on.

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist?
    ... "FrediFizzx" wrote: ... They have to have mass. ... In other words, the ether can be ... I do not have your math in front of me, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Lepton mass predictions, including neutrino
    ... the mass and sin thetaW are less-accurately known. ... The theoretical foundation for this begins with parity violation in the weak ... interactions, but in the mass term as well. ... standard electroweak model constructs a parity-conserving electromagnetic ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Prediction of Lepton masses
    ... the mass and sin thetaW are less-accurately known. ... The theoretical foundation for this begins with parity violation in the weak ... interactions, but in the mass term as well. ... standard electroweak model constructs a parity-conserving electromagnetic ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Gerald L. OBarr and the At Theory.
    ... Ilja Schmelzer wrote: ... If you want to have the math, ... results after a serious of interactions that brings ... I am sorry if my progress is not as fast ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction
    ... > you claim basing the poincare invariance on spacetime is wrong. ... >>Why electron mass should depend on interactions in which electron ... > terms of an interaction and different interactions are different. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)