Re: More on Lorenz contraction


Chris (no-spam) wrote:
My University course said it had. See my web page:

http://www.newelectricity.co.uk/

You need to look, I think it is the page "new electricity".
It looks similar to:
http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/MRRtalk.html

It has been fairly well torn apart in thin ng.


Here I reproduce the mathematics I learned in my degree course on
relativity, we did the special theory where I scored a 2,1 (I mixed up over
line of sight and transverse movement and some of this stuff, like two beams
of electrons - the force between them, do they exhibit any magnetic effect?
I got wrong, got it right now) I only scored a 2,1 on my quantum mechanics
course because I did not understand the hesenburg model, but I'm getting
there. My proff was professor Stannard. I got invited to go to the states
to study Fineman, but politics got in the way.

I got 2,1 overall.

--
Chris
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141736268.851743.257420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Chris (no-spam) wrote:
I did some more experiments with a compass needle in a loop of wire
carrying
a current as well as repeating the solenoid experiment, this morning.

For a single turn the deflection was 20 degrees at the axis and 30 near
the
wire (approx), for the solenoid the deflection was the same at the axis
as
near the wire.



The results obtained with the single turn together with the results of
the
solenoid I come to the conclusion that a single turn gives a different
result from a solenoid.



This indicates that magnetism is not the phenomena that philosophers
thought
is was for 300 years since Gauss.

Lorentz contraction has nothing to do with it.

Look again.
Count the t's on this page:
<< Note that both Coulomb's law and the Biot-Savart law are
gauge independent: i.e., they do not depend on the particular
choice of gauge. >>
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node39.html


http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node26.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_integral
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/302l/lectures/node62.html
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/teal_tour.htm

I have done vector field theory but I find the notation, altough precise,
contains a lot of equations that need writing out in order to understand
what is involved.

In other words I found the notation too abstract, this is because I had a
non malignant growth removed from the language region of my brain and had to
re-learn talking and the notation of mathematics. If I remember rightly I
made a contribution to the notation of vector field theory. When I did
electromagnetism we used non-vector calculus, and wrote it all out in
cartesian form, even maxwell's equations.

Yes I gave you the URL for the time-independent version.


As far as I understand it, using the length contraction model, it can be
regarded as an alternative representation.

No... it is faulty, No matter is moving a significant
fraction of the speed of light to permit the application.

Use Multiple integral for spatial version.
Use retarded potential for temporal version.


However by noting that the force
between current carrying conductors may be calculated exactly in
electrostatic term of charge densities seen as a result of the lorenz
contraction does mean that the concept of magnetism is not valid. Magnetism
is in reality an electrostatic effect. This simplifies the model rather
than making it complex.


Deleting the concept of manetism is an application of occums razor.
Yes... Maxwell and Weber did it over a century ago.

It is just a derivative of the Coulomb force. You can use the
multiple integral and Biot Savart or Ewald summation to prove it.
Nature uses neither method so occam's razor doesn't
count in mathematics.

You shouldn't use the time dependent version for notational
simplicity because it hides the superposition and forever
saddles you with these restrictions:
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034

If you have a particle accelerator then you can actually
observe Smith-Pucell radiation and the time-dependent
equations are appropriate to describe how the beam
interacts.

For low velocity charges in a wire, a spatial integration
better describes magnetic force.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_integral

Sue...


Before my late teens I had these ideas but I was assualted by a psychiatist
hired by mum "to make me successful". Mum would say "why does he not work
for money" when doing these experiments and mathematics. His brain
operation turned me into an idiot incapable of any work of any kind, I could
not even drive a push lawn mower.

By 19 I had recovered the use of my frontal lobe and began this sort of
stuff again, I got married and started to be succesful, he then framed me
for something he did in order to destroy me. He succeeded.

The men concerned have hunted me for 30 years, unaware to me, but they
missed me because another man concerned, who returned from a carreer in
Africa to assualt me (legally), he is a magistrate with highly eccentric and
exreme religious convictions, lived just in the next road and now has found
me and recently assaulted me again after I published another book, but his
assault destroyed most of my memory, I'm told the concepts are still there.
He is mad, he mapped the nervous system, I saw his book, and because he does
not understand a bit he thinks it does not do anything and casually chops it
out.

The name of the man: Well write to me privately and I will tell you.

These assaults have to with my religious convictions and the whole christian
church seem to be involnved, several of my friends have been murdered, or
threatened with death, its getting like Kosova here.

These ideas are nothing to do with it.






Sue...

Nice to meet you sue!

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More on Lorenz contraction
    ... I think it is the page "new electricity". ... a current as well as repeating the solenoid experiment, ... This indicates that magnetism is not the phenomena that philosophers ... I have done vector field theory but I find the notation, altough precise, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: More on Lorenz contraction
    ... I think it is the page "new electricity". ... Here I reproduce the mathematics I learned in my degree course on ... a current as well as repeating the solenoid experiment, ... I have done vector field theory but I find the notation, altough precise, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Questions (Space)
    ... The connection is that if one ... I know that coils produce magnetism by electricity, ... I could only guess how you get electricity from magnets. ... very fast so the wavelength is very small. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2
    ... Next we can ask if Maxwell ... Magnetism was caused by moving charge and that charge could be moved by ... This is apt since the intertwining of electricity and magnetism were ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dumbest ideas in all of science fiction, part 1: artificial gravity
    ... Electicity and magnetism were throught to be separate forces. ... Lorenz-Fitzgerald contraction effect of moving electricity. ... theories that suggests that gravity is a rotation of space and time. ... So a science fiction author decides ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)