Re: More on Lorenz contraction



The Lorenz transform of an E field with no B field can result in a
nonzero B field. The E and B fields together make a rank 2 tensor and
all of E&M is a consequence of the transformations of that tensor into
the frames of different observers.

This is trivially true and very well known, hardly some new
"discovery". It also seems to be all that you're trying to say.


On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:35:39 +0000, Chris wrote:

In fact his methods do show that all phenomina within
electromagnetism are included without maxwell.

Not quite. Einstein built Maxwell's equations into relativity, it
was part of what led to it (the postulates of SR were chosen to keep
Maxwell's equations valid in all frames). Didn't you know that?


The lorenz contraction predicts a force on a charged body near a
current carrying conducter when it is static relative to the wire.

As I said. Just transform the E field of the electrons from their
rest frame to the frame of an observer stationary relative to the
wire, and voila, there's the B field. Second semester freshman year in a
standard physics curriculum (admittedly they do it without introducing
rank 2 tensors when the class is for freshmen...)

[ snip ]

The Soviet Union was better

How would you know? You've had your memory destroyed, you said so in
an earlier post.


The slaves of the West will never rebel, they are all detected and
lobotomised

No, that's _you_ who was lobotomized, not the "slaves of the
west". You already told us about it. Try to keep straight who you're
talking about here, please.

In Russia we all ate ...

Again, how would you know? You had your frontal lobes removed and
your memory was destroyed, remember? You said so. So whatever you
_think_ you remember about the USSR is just static, just noise on the
channel.


--
Nospam becomes physicsinsights to fix the email

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... from the light postulate. ... But, it is not incoherent. ... Let's consider two frames of reference, S and S', each in uniform ... The inverse transform is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... But, it is not incoherent. ... Let's consider two frames of reference, S and S', each in uniform ... It appears that, again, you are assuming a vector sum for the velocity vector. ... You cannot apply the transform twice. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: An Explanation of Special Relativity
    ... >> Galilean transform, ... > Actually, LET uses Lorentz transforms, not Galilean transforms. ... >> Your model lacks symmetry between two frames moving at different ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Facts and Rules for SR Transforms!
    ... > Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... > word is a transform of coordinates. ... > will be different between the frames specified. ... This is not a math theory. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A letter want to disprove my paper which submitted recently
    ... The rank of binary matrix could be simplify obtaining by Echolon ... Symposium on Graph Theory and Combinatorial Algorithms ". ... Transform your solution to a polynomial-time prime-factorizing ... algorithm and use it to crack every RSA crypto on the planet. ...
    (comp.theory)