Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Mar 2006 17:26:36 -0800
Eka Siswanto wrote:
Thanks, your explanation is very plausible. But, I think, the real
problem is not how to derive, but lays in using common sense to
interpret the above function.
If I try to quantify, for example x and x' in metre, t and t' in
second, the functions :
{ Dt = A Dt' + B Dx'
{ Dx = C Dt' + D Dx'
Suggests the addition of time quantity toward distance quantity, i.e.
how to make sense, for example 5 seconds + 7 metres ?
Unless I am using another perspective by assuming that x, x', t, t'
belongs to the same classification, then the above function can be
accepted, or do I miss some important aspect regarding this ?
A, B, C, D are not necessarily whole numbers, Eka. They can have units.
For example, I can easily write x = x' + A*t. All that has to happen is
that A have units velocity. Surely you've seen a formula like x = x' +
v*t.
If you haven't, then really you shouldn't be trying to learn relativity
before learning some basic physics.
PD
Rgds
Eka S.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: Eka Siswanto
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- References:
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: Eka Siswanto
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: PD
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: Eka Siswanto
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: Eka Siswanto
- Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- Prev by Date: Re: R we seeing the real universe
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr: Changes in lengths and rates are real!
- Previous by thread: Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- Next by thread: Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- Index(es):