Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"


<guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142094475.978442.152160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Hexenmeister wrote:
| > <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1142082119.238215.102650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > >
| > > Hexenmeister wrote:
| > >> "socratus" <israelsad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > >> news:1141976863.170569.280770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > >> > What is a quantum of light?
| > >>
| > >> The discrete amount of energy emitted by ONE atom (or molecule or
ion).
| > >>
| > >> A radio transmitter can send one photon if you turn it on and then
off
| > >> again
| > >> to let one cycle pass.
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>
| > >> > Quantum of light is a particle and wave simultaneously.
| > >>
| > >> There are no "waves" as such.
| > >> Waves are a time dependent phenomenon.
| > >> When you wave your hand you have only one hand, it changes
| > >> position with time.
| > >
| > >
| > > Correct, one electron forms an entire picture on the tv screen with
the
| > > amount call TIME.
| > >
| > > The 4 stages of the Eathereal's Extasia:
| > >
| > > 1. Therefore is a million photons actually a million photons or simply
| > > "ONE" photon travelling for a specific period we call TIME.
| > >
| > > 2. And is even that "ONE" photon indeed "ONE" photon since even "ONE"
| > > photon has no mass?
| > >
| > > 3. We may conclude that a MILLION can be only ONE.
| > >
| > > 4. We may also conclude that even ONE is not "ONE" but perhaps a
| > > "NOTHING" and what we call the SINGULARITY.
| > >
| >
| > There is only one bullet, fired from a million guns?
| > Never mind, the men in white suits will put you back in your padded cell
| > soon.
| > Androcles.
|
| why Androcles fancy meeting you here!
|
| how about a game of cards?
|

Sure. Poker ok? I know when you bluff.

Androcles.

| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >> http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Catalina/Drive.htm
| > >> http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/AC.htm
| > >>
| > >> > Exact there is a simultaneity of space and time.
| > >>
| > >> There is only one "now", where the black line is.
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>
| > >> > For me such explanation is unsatisfactory.
| > >> > It just as to speak, that the logic information and
| > >> > the senseless message are the same simultaneously.
| > >> > To say half truth is worse then to say lie.
| > >> > * * *
| > >> > Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
| > >> > Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
| > >> > a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
| > >> > No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
| > >> > If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad
one.
| > >> > Is he really mad?
| > >>
| > >> Hmm... Houdini was a magician too. Being an entertainer for money
| > >> doesn't mean you are mad. Einstein didn't let on how the trick
| > >> was done, you have to find out for yourself.
| > >> http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
| > >>
| > >> Androcles.
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>
| > >> > Socratus.
| > >> >
| > >
|


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
    ... Hexenmeister wrote: ... You either have an electric field or you have ... | then less waves can be generated to ... Since more and more we've determined particles to actually be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
    ... Hexenmeister wrote: ... My own homework? ... You are too full of pride, ... |> | waves instead and we know that communication waves of different ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Im Not Sure if this Worries Me or Not.
    ... Hexenmeister wrote: ... Fox has written a small part of it. ... | There isn't even a quotation mark showing where the quotation ends, ... I've been through this kind of thing with Androcles before. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is LET?
    ... Hexenmeister wrote: ... Don't let Androcles bother you. ... What aether theory are you babbling about, ... Fuck you too, cunt. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Proof that space is not really empty = eather
    ... Hexenmeister wrote: ... |> I want a proof that space is not really empty = eather. ... | then less waves can be generated to ... Since more and more we've determined particles to actually be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast