Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- From: xxein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 12 Mar 2006 16:56:51 -0800
Hayek wrote:
SCW wrote:
xxein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
xxein: The Lorentz Transformation is merely a
mathematical terminologic link between what we
observe, subjectively, under certain conditions
such as velocity and an almost undefinable
gravity (because Lorentz did not address it
directly - if at all), and how we think the
universe (with its laws) operates on the
objective scale.
What? Where did you get this from? Lorentz
transformations are a replacement of Galilean
transformations, which are not valid in the special
theory due to c.
It is good to first learn the Einstein method.
You will need it as practice. But don't take it
to the universal bank and expect to get credit.
That would be like a Catholic attempting to tell
Hindu's that their brand of religion is wrong.
Neither currency is accepted or exchanged by the
universe.
<rubs hands> This just gets better - I do enjoy a
mixed metaphor.
Once you get to the point where you understand
that gravity affects (curves) light, you have to
ask yourself how does the transverse effect
translate into the incident effect. Iow, if
light curves in gravity, how is the curve
manifested if it is coming directly at you in
gravity?
What do you mean "coming directly at you in
gravity" That light is attracted by a force acting
at an infinite distance directly below your feet?
How many dimensions are we talking here? If it's
Minkowski it will be a straight line (no curve).
There is no theory that addresses this in any
adequate physical and logical fashion. But if
all you want is a mathematical description, it is
there.
Addresses what exactly? A theory for why light is
affected by gravity, or a theory for "coming
directly at you in gravity" ?
Additionally, Q-theories attempt to explain the
normal and adiabatic behaviors that separates it
from complete chaos in the micro-world.
Cosmological theories are necessary to explain
the mega-structure.
None of the above theories are scalable, up or
down, to achieve a satisfactory understanding of
the universe and the laws by which it operates.
We have not quite found such a theory, yet. You
will eventually determine this for yourself.
"[...] complete chaos in the micro-world" is
subjective anthropomorphism.
And then as you will eventually attempt to make a
theory that encompasses all observations and
their objective progenitor causes (relating the
subjective to the objective), you will have spent
30 or 40 yrs. of effort only to find that hardly
anyone can follow your perfect logic.
Welcome to physics and the relative observation
of it all.
Well, thanks for that "objective" opinion - it
cheered me up no end!
You first thought you had to do with a moron, and you
would have liked to make fun of him, but as you read
on, you suddenly noticed that this guy was out of your
ligue...
You only exposed yourself as a sociopath...
Uwe Hayek.
--
This is the bitterest pain among men, to have much
knowledge but no power.
Herodotus (484 BC - 430 BC), The Histories of Herodotus
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the
ability to learn from the experience of others, are
also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to
do so. -- Douglas Adams, Last Chance to See
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Does a Magnet's force weaken witht the distance cube?
- Next by Date: Re: Does a Magnet's force weaken witht the distance cube?
- Previous by thread: Re: My Quests on Learning Lorentz Transformation
- Next by thread: Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
