Re: SR says, "The Earth is the Centre Of The Universe".
- From: valls@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Mar 2006 06:04:34 -0800
Henri Wilson ha escrito:
According to SR, if the universe were filled with randomly moving light sourcesSR only claims that vacuum light speed measured in any inertial frame
that emit periodic light pulses, then all the pulses moving in any one
direction would retain their exact geometric relationship with each other as
they traversed vast distances of space. In other words, they would move at the
same speed. If more moving light sources were added, their pulses would move in
synchrony with the ones already there. SR says there is a unique light speed
for all light traveling in any one direction.
is always the same c. Indeed, this is a postulate of SR, and it will
never be proved or disproved by any experimental test because absolute
vacuum is only an ideal concept totally impossible to obtain in the
real world. This is nothing new in science, a path without friction
that corresponds to an absolute inertial movement for a body is a
similar ideal concept (and as the constant vacuum light speed c, a very
useful one).
When Einstein looked upwards into the sky, he obviously visualised all the¿Who said that Einstein supposed the Earth surface at rest in an
light which moved past the Earth from east to west did so at one fixed speed.
Similarly, he imagined all the light that travelled from west to east also did
so at one speed. He claimed that the speed is c in both directions in the
Earth's frame. (To a non-Einsteinian, there is no reason to believe any of
this)
inertial frame?¿Who said that Einstein supposed an absolute vacuum
over the Earth?
SR claims that the speed of all light arriving at Earth from any direction¿Who said that the Earth is at rest in an inertial frame? In the Solar
travels at c wrt the Earth. Astronomers, in their innocence, rely on this
concept and make terrible mistakes.
System inertial frame (the one where its center of mass is at rest),
the Earth is known moving at about 30Km/s in a non-linear trajectory.
The SR prediction about light arriving the Earth is that the relative
velocity between light and Earth, as measured in the Solar System
inertial frame, is C-V, where C and V are the vectors corresponding to
the considered light ray and Earth velocities in the Solar System
inertial frame. It is a common mistake of both, non-Einstenians and
Einstenians, to think that we cannot use ordinary vector operations for
the calculation of a relative velocity between two moving entities
respect to some inertial frame. That relative velocity is NOT a
relativistic invariant, as it were in the Newtonian view. The cause of
this common mistake is not putting sufficient attention to the fact the
the relativistic velocity composition rule only applies to velocities
that belong to DIFFERENT inertial frames. When we have velocities that
correspond to the SAME inertial frame, as is the case for the
considered C and V, ordinary vector operations can be done. We can find
this kind of operations even in the first Einstein's Jun30 1905
relativity paper (about 8 instances in paragraph 3).
According to SR, little planet Earth finds itself in quite a unique situationNothing specific at all with Earth in SR, the first postulate of SR is
amongst all the other planets.
It is the one about which all light moves exactly symmetrically.
precisely that physical laws are the same respect to all inertial
frames, no matter if it is the associated with the Solar System center
of mass or any other similar one with any other star.
EARTH MUST BE THE CENTRE OF THE UNIVERSE!!!This is not a correct derivation from SR, as explained before.
Now any human with more than half a brain can see that this cannot be
correct...so let's try to find the truth of the matter.
The obvious truth is that the only reason why nonsenseical theories like SR and
the Big Bang have been even considered is that they appeal to the powerful
religious lobby, both christian and jewish.
I say that in reality, both theories are the greatest load of crap ever
presented under the name of science. There is no evidence for either.
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Particles of sound
- Next by Date: "Gravity"
- Previous by thread: Re: SR says, "The Earth is the Centre Of The Universe".
- Next by thread: Re: SR says, "The Earth is the Centre Of The Universe".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
