Re: Particles for Sue and Sal
- From: "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:51:26 GMT
"Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:J3RRf.15759$zk4.13993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| What do you think it worth?
A thing is worth what someone will pay for it.
I'm not paying you anything for it.
Androcles.
| --
| Chris
| "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:AWORf.15424$zk4.9871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
| > news:QqIRf.174880$YJ4.122998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Hello,
| > |
| > | I have a simple minded theory of elementary particles that people may
be
| > | interested in.
| >
| > Wrong.
| > If it's a good, sound, well thought out theory then nobody will be
| > interested,
| > least of all Sue or Sal, they have their own agendas. If it is stupid
the
| > kooks
| > still will not rave over it unless you say the magic word "LorEinstz"
| > first.
| > You need to advertise better, Chris. Do as Einstein did, sell it.
| > Even then it takes an atom bomb to become popular.
| >
| > Androcles.
| >
| >
|
|
.
- References:
- Particles for Sue and Sal
- From: Chris
- Re: Particles for Sue and Sal
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Particles for Sue and Sal
- From: Chris
- Particles for Sue and Sal
- Prev by Date: Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
- Next by Date: Re: Why is the Speed Of Light Constant?
- Previous by thread: Re: Particles for Sue and Sal
- Next by thread: How did the Big Bang evolve?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|