Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:07:10 GMT
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143091931.744059.191120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
as you
Gary Eickmeier wrote:
kenseto wrote:
The current idea is that space is doing the faster than light
expansion....not the atoms are rushing faster than the speed of light
Einsteinseem to imply. I am not endorsing this nonsense. Space according to
light?.is empty....so how can emptiness expand faster than the speed of
link:A better explanation of the origin of the universe is in the following
read.http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2006universe
Ken Seto
Gotcha Ken, and I am trying to read your article. I think it confirms
for me that this stuff is not signed, sealed, delivered by any means,
and I am not stupid or crazy to not believe in some of the things I
And if you can't spot the nonsense in what Ken wrote, then you're not
really in a good position to evaluate the sensibility of big bang
theory.
The nonsense is on your part. So why don't you answer the question how empty
space can expand faster than light?
Ken Seto
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: PD
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- References:
- The BIG Bang!
- From: Gary Eickmeier
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: xxein
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: Gary Eickmeier
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: kenseto
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: Gary Eickmeier
- Re: The BIG Bang!
- From: PD
- The BIG Bang!
- Prev by Date: Re: Constant Light Speed
- Next by Date: Twin Paradox.
- Previous by thread: Re: The BIG Bang!
- Next by thread: Re: The BIG Bang!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
