Re: E = 1/2mv^2


"tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143307280.707954.11100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| PD wrote:
| > kolt wrote:
| > > KE = 1/2mv^2. This is the equation for kinetic energy.
| >
| > No, it's not.

Yes it is.


| You don't know a whole lot of things, PD - too numerous to mention, in
| fact. The OP did not say it applies at all speeds, only that it
| applies to all bodies. By low speeds, you mean what? Ten mph? 0.09
| c? Don't be so imprecise in your arguments.

Too right he doesn't. He's a parrot.


| >
| > > Simply put, it
| > > is mass in motion. Any kind of energy should involve mass and motion.
| > > Therefore, it should be that E = KE, for what other kind of energy can
| > > there be other than kinetic? It also follows that mass = potential
| > > energy.
| >
| Your KE does not involve mass and motion, does it, PD? Yours only
| involves energy having momentum, right? Even though your argument has
| been trashed over and over again in these ngs, you and the silly Hobbit
| continue to use it.
|
| The original formula, E=mc^2+(energy of motion),

Ahem...
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/E^2/Energy1.gif

Energy of motion has been accounted for. E = mv^2 for TWO halves
of ONE mass.
Androcles.



refers to the fact
| that everything is in motion wrt the universe. Your silly massless
| photon concept ignores that reality and proclaims that a case of
| constant velocity overthrows that reality. AE made it abundantly clear
| that his shortened formula, E=mc^2, was valid only in a case of two or
| more objects at constant velocity wrt each other. You, et al, made it
| a religion and elevated it to claims that it represents reality.
|


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More evidence of negative curvature
    ... >> That mass goes in but energy comes out? ... That of mass breaking down into ... > There is no universal reference frame, but a reference frame is an ... > measured in terms of their motion. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
    ... That would correspond to the motion reflecting ... W is energy transformation ... means finite mass still. ... Actually I learned classical physics better than the relativistic ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: E = 1/2mv^2
    ... Any kind of energy should involve mass and motion. ... more objects at constant velocity wrt each other. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
    ... That would correspond to the motion reflecting ... W is energy transformation ... means finite mass still. ... Actually I learned classical physics better than the relativistic ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: E = 1/2mv^2
    ... Any kind of energy should involve mass and motion. ... momentum is another property of a physical system. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)