Re: Satanic Physics
- From: "Josef Matz" <josefmatz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:45:52 +0200
"socratus" <israelsad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1143283999.161924.198020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The physics is not satanic science.
The physics is not abstract science.
The physics interpretation is abstract.
1.
The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract
separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.
2.
The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract
ideal gas theory.
3.
The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on
the abstract black body theory.
4.
The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory
of four-dimensional space theory.
On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of
science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.
But in Nature there are no paradoxes observed.
Something is not in order with logical thinking.
It is necessary to stop, look back and
to reconsider the abstract base of science.
Maybe the abstract ideas are not abstract ones.
Socratus.
Hey Socratus you should know that the concrete nature does not necessarily
need an abstract descripzion at all.
Josef
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Satanic Physics
- From: kolt
- Re: Satanic Physics
- References:
- Satanic Physics
- From: kolt
- Re: Satanic Physics
- From: socratus
- Satanic Physics
- Prev by Date: Re: Twin Paradox.
- Next by Date: Re: The BIG Bang!
- Previous by thread: Re: Satanic Physics
- Next by thread: Re: Satanic Physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|