Re: Time for a photon.
- From: "Henry Haapalainen" <kirppu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:49:24 +0300
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti
viestissä news:Dv_Xf.12404$kT4.2648@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear DaveL:A11
"DaveL" <Top Poster Extraordinaire> wrote in message
news:afCdncS-h4vTva3ZRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Time dilation is only good for one thing. Sci-fi.
SciFi or not, "reality" or not, it agrees with experiment.
Nothing else attempted in the last 100 years does.
David A. Smith
In relativity theory, time has been made a varying quantity like weight and
distance. This assumption is still unsupported by any research result.
Relativity theory's most enthusiastic supporters believe that there should
be a mass of evidence - but there is none. There are only misunderstandings
of how an atomic clock operates (the effect of acceleration), and
misunderstandings of what objective research demands. In many cases,
attempts have been made to use the theory to prove itself.
http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/
Henry Haapalainen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time for a photon.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time for a photon.
- From: PD
- Re: Time for a photon.
- References:
- Re: Time for a photon.
- From: Peter Christensen
- Re: Time for a photon.
- From: DaveL
- Re: Time for a photon.
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Time for a photon.
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativity of Simultaneity Violates Isotropy of the Speed of Light.
- Next by Date: Re: I'm Not Sure if this Worries Me or Not.
- Previous by thread: Re: Time for a photon.
- Next by thread: Re: Time for a photon.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
