Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material


"YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:444162b8$0$30092$636a55ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Hexenmeister a icrit :
| > "YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4441364f$0$11337$636a55ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a icrit :
| > | > It would really be helpful if one did not have to wade through the
| > | > inordinate amount of invective and caustic name calling to find the the
| > | > good stuff on this discussion group.
| > |
| > | You are perfectly right, but cannot get rid of an history of
| > | accumulation of incredible blunders from cranks like Wiston,
| > | Androcles (aka Hexenwhatever, aka ...), Seto, Hayek, etc.
| > | who are the plague (and the funny part) of this group,
| > |
| > | Given they only reacted to the pointing out of their
| > | basic mistakes and deep misunderstanding of SR
| >
| > Coming from you that's rich.
| >
| > Your Basic Moron:
| > "so it is not true that ( A xor B ) => (A or B) ?"
| > Androcles:
| > Hey moron, xor is a binary operator, you stupid ***, just like +, -, * and /
| > are binary operators. They don't "imply" at all.
|
| What the hell is your miscomprehension of basic logic this times ?


You've proven you are an ineducable idiot, there is no need to repeat it.
Basic logic:
(1 xor 1) = 0, (1 or 1) = 1.

*** off.
Androcles.

.