Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Apr 2006 19:28:10 -0700
fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It has long been my impression that Fox was a secret
Ritz admirer
Not at all secret, actually. But he also maintained a rigorous
intellectual honesty, and when his experiment yielded results
totally incompatible with emission theory, he accepted his
results and all that they implied, rather than attempt excuses.
Jerry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- References:
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: YBM
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: YBM
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: YBM
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: YBM
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: YBM
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Jerry
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: Jerry
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- Prev by Date: Re: What is a field???
- Next by Date: Re: Tree Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- Next by thread: Re: Ritz ballistic emission theory material
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|