Re: dimensions are energy??




Henry Haapalainen wrote:
"Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> kirjoitti viestissä
news:KYy3g.15975$vy1.7706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Nishu" <amitk_dni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145981200.084225.155460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear David, Of course you must be right. You may have a lot of
knowledge of the subject but I am only very new.I'm just 16 but have
far more knowledge of this subject then my peers and much more than a
layman. All I wish to say is that can't we look into something with a
completely different perspective.

"...look into something with a completely different perspective." That
sounds like true science to me, unlike most of the postings here.

Ah! You confuse "science" with "originality".
You think scientists get famous because they are creative and not
because they are *right*?
Henry, I think we've found the source of your problem!

PD


Henry Haapalainen


Sure - but that perspective must make sense. Dimension and energy are
entirely different concepts. For a modern view of what energy is see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem
As you can there is a connection - but it is subtle.

Maybe it is these dimension limits of
energy that don't allow us to cross light's speed or cool anything
below 0 K(-273.15 c) .Maybe if we can find some way to break these
hidden energy barriers and so we can escape into new dimensions( which
may not be curved or string scale small) with diffrent energy bounds.
This might sound funny to you, but please reply me back.

That is a lot of ifs - in science it is wise to proceed with less grand
speculation and only after one has understood the basics:
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theorist.html
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theoristbad.html

Maintain your interest - but harness it correctly.

Thanks
Bill



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The reality of entity
    ... bullet has kinetic energy, but that energy is represented as a property ... with you that there is no time dimension outside consciousness. ... discussion with those of a physics background. ...
    (sci.philosophy.meta)
  • Re: The reality of entity
    ... part shapes the reality of the objects we observe and measure. ... I don't know that time is simply a consequence of motion. ... constantly process energy. ... You are modeling time as a dimension in which the past is somewhere ...
    (sci.philosophy.meta)
  • Re: The reality of entity
    ... Admittedly I'm coming from discussing this on physics forums, ... present time may not be real, in which case measurement will be ... a fired bullet has kinetic energy, but that energy is represented as ... direction, not a time dimension, so your basic point holds, I ...
    (sci.philosophy.meta)
  • Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
    ... Time may be a *conceptual dimension* which only exists in our minds as ... X, Y, & Z coordinates give use three dimensions matter can move in. ... that matter or energy can actually move through. ... it would seem the timeline itself would disappear. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Time is Everywhere - No observer required
    ... observer does not exist doesn't mean time doesn't exist. ... But understand that for matter to stop its motion completely, ... would unravel back into pure energy. ... should be considered a dimension itself. ...
    (sci.physics)