Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- From: "Vert" <avergon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Apr 2006 17:22:25 -0700
DIRK VAN DE POODLE
Longitudinal length of an object in relative motion with respect to
you, is the difference between the distances of two points on the
object, measured simultaneously in your frame.
Since nothing is moving between the endpoints of the object
during some time interval, the act of dividing the difference between
these distances by a time interval is meaningless.
VERT
You're suffering from myopea. You just said that the *length* is the
"distance".You are agreeing with me and don't know it. Next, you are
saying that dividing the distance by time is meaningless*! I guess you
never learned the definition of velocity. Pity.
Restated: The velocity of the moving frame is
greater than the observed velocity. Thus we have two velocities, the
observed velocity -- and the true velocity of the moving frame. The two
velocities are Lorentz variant. That is true velocity times the Lorentz
transform equals the observed velocity.
V D Poodle
The distance of the origin of the moving frame is not a
longitudinal length of anything,
VERGON
Never said it was.
VDP
since it is not the difference between
two fixed points on a moving object.
It seems that you really have no idea what you are talking about.
VERGON
One of us doesn't --- hello.
Where V is the velocity of the moving frame, v the observed velocity,
and R the Lorentz transform ---
v ( 1- v^2/c^2) , V x R = v
It seems that you have a problem writing down a proper equation.
Have you ever read some kind of introduction to physics?
VERGON
Learn to read. Notice the comma. The equation is V x R = v.
Apparently you never had (or understood) an introduction to algebra.
You know, you are more intrested in knocking someone down than in
learnng something.
That's why you're so dumb.
Until you change --- if ever --- I'll not be wasting my time answering
your stupid posts.
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: SRian method 'proving' classical EM invariance; ROFFLMAO!
- Next by Date: Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Previous by thread: Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Next by thread: Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|